From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel panic - not syncing: out of memory and no killable processes
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:58:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253285923.30531.17.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0909171446230.22063@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:59 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > Absolutely 100% udevd related. It always pops right when udev starts.
> > Every time. I don't know how to get that to come out on the serial
> > port, you only get to see the kernel messages (although there is nothing
> > on the screen other than "Starting udev"
> >
> > Reverting 3f2aa307c4d26b4ed6509d0a79e8254c9e07e921 causes the problem to
> > go away. I now am running a 79b520e87e kernel + your patch (adding
> > console_verbose()) + reverting 3f2aa307c4d2 and it seems to be working.
> >
>
> Isolating udevd down to an interactivity scheduling change isn't _that_
> bizarre. I think the setting of UDEVD_PRIORITY is already mostly
> arbitrary anyway and it'll allow 192 children on your 512M machine by
> default unless you changed UDEVD_MAX_CHILDS for uid 0.
>
> The default timeout for idle workers is 3 seconds, which may just happen
> to be long enough to panic your machine because of low memory. If that's
> the case, I don't believe that it's a scheduler issue but rather a root
> abuse of setting all udevd threads to be OOM_DISABLE.
>
> What is your udevd --version? The latest is udev-146 released last month.
145
Let me try and clone the vm some I don't break my reproducer. I'll see
if adding more memory fixes it. Doesn't look like Fedora has built a
-146 yet, I'll see if I can get one of those as well.
udev bug, configuration issue, whatever, or not, it's a regression that
I used to be able to boot and updating my kernel leaves me unable to
boot. I think we all agree when 512M of memory isn't enough to boot to
runlevel 3 we've got a problem :)
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 3:36 Eric Paris
2009-09-17 12:43 ` Eric Paris
2009-09-17 20:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-17 20:35 ` Eric Paris
2009-09-17 21:01 ` Eric Paris
2009-09-17 21:15 ` Eric Paris
2009-09-17 21:24 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-17 21:31 ` Eric Paris
2009-09-17 21:59 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-18 14:58 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2009-09-18 19:58 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-17 21:27 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253285923.30531.17.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®