mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com, shaohua.li@intel.com,
	chris.mason@oracle.com, jack@suse.cz,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] writeback: move inodes from one super_block together
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:40:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253803236-20760-9-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253803236-20760-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>

From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>

__mark_inode_dirty adds inode to wb dirty list in random order. If a disk has
several partitions, writeback might keep spindle moving between partitions.
To reduce the move, better write big chunk of one partition and then move to
another. Inodes from one fs usually are in one partion, so idealy move indoes
from one fs together should reduce spindle move. This patch tries to address
this. Before per-bdi writeback is added, the behavior is write indoes
from one fs first and then another, so the patch restores previous behavior.
The loop in the patch is a bit ugly, should we add a dirty list for each
superblock in bdi_writeback?

Test in a two partition disk with attached fio script shows about 3% ~ 6%
improvement.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 15944f7..b27406d 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -334,13 +334,28 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct list_head *delaying_queue,
 			       struct list_head *dispatch_queue,
 				unsigned long *older_than_this)
 {
+	LIST_HEAD(tmp);
+	struct list_head *pos, *node;
+	struct super_block *sb;
+	struct inode *inode;
+
 	while (!list_empty(delaying_queue)) {
-		struct inode *inode = list_entry(delaying_queue->prev,
-						struct inode, i_list);
+		inode = list_entry(delaying_queue->prev, struct inode, i_list);
 		if (older_than_this &&
 		    inode_dirtied_after(inode, *older_than_this))
 			break;
-		list_move(&inode->i_list, dispatch_queue);
+		list_move(&inode->i_list, &tmp);
+	}
+
+	/* Move inodes from one superblock together */
+	while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
+		inode = list_entry(tmp.prev, struct inode, i_list);
+		sb = inode->i_sb;
+		list_for_each_prev_safe(pos, node, &tmp) {
+			inode = list_entry(pos, struct inode, i_list);
+			if (inode->i_sb == sb)
+				list_move(&inode->i_list, dispatch_queue);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.6.4.1.207.g68ea


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-24 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-24 14:40 [PATCH 0/10] Current writeback patch queue Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] fs: Fix busyloop in wb_writeback() Jens Axboe
2009-09-25  0:48   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 02/10] writeback: balance_dirty_pages() shall write more than dirtied pages Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 15:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] writeback: stop background writeback when below background threshold Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 15:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-24 15:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-24 16:13       ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 16:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25  0:47           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 04/10] writeback: kupdate writeback shall not stop when more io is possible Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] writeback: cleanup writeback_single_inode() Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 06/10] writeback: improve readability of the wb_writeback() continue/break logic Jens Axboe
2009-09-25  0:52   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] writeback: get rid to incorrect references to pdflush in comments Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 14:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] writeback: don't resort for a single super_block in move_expired_inodes() Jens Axboe
2009-09-24 14:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] writeback: make the super_block pinning more efficient Jens Axboe
2009-09-25  2:55 ` [PATCH 0/10] Current writeback patch queue Wu Fengguang
2009-09-25  4:06   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1253803236-20760-9-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®