From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: iceberg <strakh@ispras.ru>,
eric@andante.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: sleeping function called from invalid context
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:23:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253841816.5183.361.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090924155604.4299aa0a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 15:56 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:58:47 +0000
> iceberg <strakh@ispras.ru> wrote:
>
> > Driver scsi_lib.c might sleep in atomic context, because it calls
> > scsi_device_put under spin_lock_irqsave.
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:356:
> > spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> > scsi_device_put(sdev);
> > Path to might_sleep macro from scsi_device_put:
> > 1. scsi_device_put calls put_device at ./drivers/scsi/scsi.c:1111
> > 2. put_device calls kobject_put at ./drivers/base/core.c:1038
> > 3. kobject_put calls kref_put at ./lib/kobject.c
> > 4. kref_put may call callback function kobject_release at ./lib/kref.c if
> > refcount becomes zero, which might_sleep because it calls user event. Details:
> > 4.1 kobject_cleanup calls kobject_uevent at ./lib/kobject.c:555
> > 4.2 kobject_uevent calls kobject_uevent_env at ./lib/kobject_uevent.c:282
> > 4.3 kobject_uevent_env calls call_usermodehelper_exec at
> > ./include/linux/kmod.h:83
> > 4.4 call_usermodehelper_exec calls wait_for_completion at
> > ./kernel/kmod.c:481
> > 4.5 wait_for_completion calls wait_for_common at ./kernel/sched.c:5710
> > 4.5 wait_for_common calls might_sleep at ./kernels/sched.c:5692
> >
> > Found by Linux Driver Verification project.
> >
> > Delete wrong sleeping function calls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Strakh <strakh@ispras.ru>
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/./a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/./b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index f3c4089..a8f8e2f 100644
> > --- a/./a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/./b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -353,9 +353,9 @@ static void scsi_single_lun_run(struct scsi_device
> > *current_sdev)
> >
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> > blk_run_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> >
> > - scsi_device_put(sdev);
> > + scsi_device_put(sdev);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> > }
> > out:
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> >
>
> Well this is strange. afacit all the code to which you refer is
> ancient, so why did this bug just pop up now?
No idea. I think the root cause of this is in the kobject code: we
explicitly require the ability to call last put from interrupt context
(and that includes holding locks). I'll talks to Greg and Kai about
this (they're both here at plumbers). I think the fix is to indirect
the kobject uevent stuff via a usermode helper so we don't get this
problem.
James
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-25 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-23 17:58 iceberg
2009-09-24 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-25 1:23 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-10-01 18:32 ` James Bottomley
2009-10-05 18:35 ` iceberg
2009-10-05 15:13 ` James Bottomley
2009-10-06 12:30 ` iceberg
2009-10-06 13:50 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253841816.5183.361.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric@andante.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=strakh@ispras.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®