From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751983AbZIYJxY (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:53:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751825AbZIYJxW (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:53:22 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53074 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751816AbZIYJxV (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:53:21 -0400 Subject: Re: ARCH=x86 patch From: David Woodhouse To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Jeff Dike , Sam Ravnborg , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <4ABC8F50.2030006@zytor.com> References: <4ABC8F50.2030006@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:50:46 -0700 Message-Id: <1253872246.4310.1448.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 02:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I am confused, because I could have sworn I had tested this combination > already, but having applied Jeff's UM fix and then David's ARCH=x86 > patch on top of that, I now find that all the 32-bit builds crap out > when building on a 64-bit platform, due to asm-offsets.c being compiled > with -m64 rather than -m32. Argh. All this nonsense simply because Ingo objected to my previous patch... purely on the basis that it made 'make randconfig' actually random. -- dwmw2