From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com>,
stable@kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: ecryptfs fix imbalance message
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:00:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254340821.3544.12.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC3AC33.1020907@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 14:06 -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 04:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > The underlying files are measured. Update the counters to get rid of
> > the ecryptfs imbalance message. (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/519737)
> >
> > Reported-by: Sachin Garg <ascii79@gmail.com>
> > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ecryptfs/main.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> > index 9f0aa98..177e61e 100644
> > --- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> > +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> > #include <linux/key.h>
> > #include <linux/parser.h>
> > #include <linux/fs_stack.h>
> > +#include <linux/ima.h>
> > #include "ecryptfs_kernel.h"
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -135,7 +136,8 @@ int ecryptfs_init_persistent_file(struct dentry *ecryptfs_dentry)
> > "rc = [%d]\n", lower_dentry, lower_mnt, rc);
> > rc = PTR_ERR(inode_info->lower_file);
> > inode_info->lower_file = NULL;
> > - }
> > + } else
> > + ima_counts_get(inode_info->lower_file);
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> > return rc;
>
> Hi Mimi - I can't think of why we would want to measure the underlying
> files. The file contents are encrypted with a randomly generated key
> and there is eCryptfs metadata stored in the first 8K of the underlying
> file. If you have two eCryptfs mounts, using the same key, and copy the
> same file into both mount points, you'll end up with two entirely
> different underlying files.
>
> Taking a closer look at IMA is still on my TODO list, so I could be
> missing something obvious. The upper (decrypted) file is being
> measured, right?
>
> For performance and the reason mentioned above, it seems like the proper
> fix is to only measure the upper file. What do you think?
>
> Tyler
Yes, the terminology 'underlying files are measured' was incorrect. It
is measuring the decrypted files.
Thanks!
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-30 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 21:08 Mimi Zohar
2009-09-29 23:48 ` James Morris
2009-09-30 12:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2009-09-30 19:06 ` Tyler Hicks
2009-09-30 20:00 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2009-09-30 22:37 ` Tyler Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254340821.3544.12.camel@dyn9002018117.watson.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kirkland@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®