From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755227Ab1JYHrh (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:47:37 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:35056 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751722Ab1JYHrg (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:47:36 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3-dev To: NeilBrown Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM list , mark gross , LKML , John Stultz , Alan Stern Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM / Sleep: Extended control of suspend/hibernate interfaces In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:52:44 +1100." <20111025135244.710e43fa@notabene.brown> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <201110132145.42270.rjw@sisk.pl> <201110231516.36787.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111024104444.09337fe6@notabene.brown> <201110241223.43362.rjw@sisk.pl> <20111025135244.710e43fa@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1319528840_3131P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:47:20 -0400 Message-ID: <12555.1319528840@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=steiner.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020206.4EA6698D.0031,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1319528840_3131P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:52:44 +1100, NeilBrown said: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:23:43 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > On Monday, October 24, 2011, NeilBrown wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:16:36 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > Similarly every system need one process to manage suspend. It can be my > > > daemon or your daemon or Alan's daemon but it cannot be 2 or more of them > > > running at the same time as that doesn't make any more sense than having > > > systemd and init running at the same time. > > > > I agree that it doesn't makes sense. I don't agree that it implies people > > won't try to do that. > > Does that matter? If they complain, tell them it isn't a supported > configuration. We however *should* design things in such a way that if a second one is started up, it tosses a nice obvious -EIDIOT error of some sort. --==_Exmh_1319528840_3131P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFOpmmIcC3lWbTT17ARApZZAKD0CGbnqUSEmyUTNuANl/LdYX2AAACfWjjX bo0+En3YcMBrW0+R7ZfHzIM= =Axmn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1319528840_3131P--