From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] Unified UUID/GUID definition
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:06:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255504003.6047.1196.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255503671.1851.43.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 15:01 +0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:30 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > There are many different UUID/GUID definitions in kernel, such as that
> > in EFI, many file systems, some drivers, etc. Every kernel components
> > need UUID/GUID has its own definition. This patch provides a unified
> > definition for UUID/GUID.
> >
> > UUID is defined via typedef. This makes that UUID appears more like a
> > preliminary type, and makes the data type explicit (comparing with
> > implicit "u8 uuid[16]").
> >
> > The binary representation of UUID/GUID can be little-endian (used by
> > EFI, etc) or big-endian (defined by RFC4122), so both is defined.
> []
> > +typedef struct {
> > + __u8 b[16];
> > +} uuid_le;
> > +
> > +typedef struct {
> > + __u8 b[16];
> > +} uuid_be;
>
> I thought you originally suggested something like:
>
> typedef union {
> u8 b[16];
> struct {
> __be32 time_low;
> __be16 time_mid;
> __be16 time_hi_and_version;
> u8 clock_seq_hi;
> u8 clock_seq_low;
> u8 node[6];
> } v1;
> } uuid_be;
>
> typedef union {
> u8 b[16];
> struct {
> __le32 time_low;
> __le16 time_mid;
> __le16 time_hi_and_version;
> u8 clock_seq_hi;
> u8 clock_seq_low;
> u8 node[6];
> } v1;
> } uuid_le;
I just think the struct in union is of little use in kernel actually. I
only find that it is used in fs/afs for converting between little endian
and big endian and DEC version 1 style UUID generation. Both can be done
without the union (struct) definition.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-14 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-14 6:30 Huang Ying
2009-10-14 7:01 ` Joe Perches
2009-10-14 7:06 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2009-10-16 9:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-10-16 9:19 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1255504003.6047.1196.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®