From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>,
Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc5-git1 -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:34:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256200483.12174.16.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADDBD2A.7070807@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1741 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 09:37 -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> Resending with wrapping off and time info removed:
Hey, thanks for that!
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.32-rc5-git1 #1
> -------------------------------------------------------
> events/0/9 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&rfkill->sync_work){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1039083>]
> __cancel_work_timer+0x81/0x181
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&ehotk->hotplug_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<f8587708>]
> eeepc_rfkill_hotplug+0x45/0xda [eeepc_laptop]
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #2 (&ehotk->hotplug_lock){+.+.+.}:
> [<c129e5ee>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x33
> [<f8587708>] eeepc_rfkill_hotplug+0x45/0xda [eeepc_laptop]
> [<f858787c>] eeepc_rfkill_set+0x1d/0x2d [eeepc_laptop]
> [<f83f4a9f>] rfkill_set_block+0x6f/0xb1 [rfkill]
> [<f83f4b78>] __rfkill_switch_all+0x2e/0x51 [rfkill]
> [<f83f4c12>] rfkill_switch_all+0x33/0x41 [rfkill]
> [<f83f51b0>] rfkill_op_handler+0xf0/0x11e [rfkill]
> [<c1038965>] worker_thread+0x161/0x233
> [<c103b883>] kthread+0x5f/0x64
> [<c1003613>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>
> -> #1 (rfkill_global_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> [<c104ac60>] __lock_acquire+0x9fb/0xb6d
> [<c104ae2e>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x73
> [<c129e223>] __mutex_lock_common+0x39/0x375
> [<c129e5ee>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x33
> [<f83f4c36>] rfkill_sync_work+0x16/0x35 [rfkill]
Hmm. It seems eeepc takes the hotplug lock in the set path, but also
elsewhere? Seems like a bug in eeepc, Alan?
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-23 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 13:37 Miles Lane
2009-10-22 8:34 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-20 13:54 Miles Lane
2009-10-20 12:35 Miles Lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256200483.12174.16.camel@johannes.local \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®