mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [performance problem] CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE: Increased kernel build times
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:18:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256303931.20866.826.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091023074533.GA10067@elte.hu>

On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 09:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Steve,
> 
> i did an 64-bit allyesconfig build test (with debug_info disabled), with 
> and without CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE set.
> 
> The build time results are:
> 
>   -CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE:   266.30
>   +CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE:   296.07 (+11.2%)
> 
> So we get more than 10% build time overhead.
> 
> That's quite high - higher than what i remember having measured 
> originally when the first iteration of the mcount code went in.
> 
> This extra overhead comes from the mcount post-processing script 
> (scripts/recordmcount.pl) that runs objcopy as well and is written in 
> Perl. I think this whole angle needs to be improved - 10% is way too 
> high of a price to pay.

Yeah, I know this is quite a hit, and to fix this is on my todo list.
What I plan on doing is checking if libelf is installed, and if it is,
then doing a C program that does the linking and checking. If not, it
defaults back to the perl code.

But I'm bug hunting right now, and that takes a higher priority.

-- Steve


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-23 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-23  7:45 Ingo Molnar
     [not found] ` <520f0cf10910230307k91d0c80sa3d69bcd74d6e1f1@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-23 10:18   ` John Kacur
2009-10-23 10:37     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 13:18 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256303931.20866.826.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®