From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: The Bloatwatch Edition, v7
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:56:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256673376.26028.422.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE6A0BD.1080102@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 15:26 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I found something weird about NO_HZ, maybe I misunderstood the codes.
>
> see this flow:
>
> cpu idle
> enter nohz
> cpu halt
> ---->interrupt happens
> irq_enter()
> we don't reprogram the clock device #1
> irq_exit()
> tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(inidle = 0)
> something disallow this cpu reenter nohz #2
> we don't reprogram the clock device #3
> <----interrupt return
> cpu halt again and wait interrupt for a long time than expected #4
> exit nohz
>
>
> #1 tick_nohz_kick_tick() is disabled in the current mainline kernel,
> so we don't calls tick_nohz_restart(ts, now) when irq_enter()
>
> static void tick_nohz_kick_tick(int cpu)
> {
> #if 0 <------------- here
> /* Switch back to 2.6.27 behaviour */
>
> struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> ktime_t delta, now;
>
> if (!ts->tick_stopped)
> return;
>
> /*
> * Do not touch the tick device, when the next expiry is either
> * already reached or less/equal than the tick period.
> */
> now = ktime_get();
> delta = ktime_sub(hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer), now);
> if (delta.tv64 <= tick_period.tv64)
> return;
>
> tick_nohz_restart(ts, now); <----------- here
> #endif
> }
>
>
> #2 When rcu_needs_cpu() or printk_needs_cpu()
> returns true then tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() will just return.
>
> #3 And we don't reprogram the clock device when #2 happens
>
> #4 So we may be in nohz for a long time than expected, but actually
> we have some work to do. (rcu, printk... etc)
>
> So I think, we need to reprogram the clock device and restart the tick
> when #2 happens, or there is something that I have misunderstood.
This looks like a different question than you asked before. And
something I don't know the answer to ;-)
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-09 22:49 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/3] Tiny RCU and expedited SRCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-09 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: The Bloatwatch Edition, v7 Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-12 9:29 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-10-12 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-12 17:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-13 6:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-10-13 7:44 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-10-13 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-14 0:37 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-10-14 1:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-14 2:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-10-14 2:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-27 7:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-10-27 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-10-14 2:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-09 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Add synchronize_srcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-09 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: add synchronize_srcu_expedited() to the rcutorture test suite Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-10 3:47 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/3] Tiny RCU and expedited SRCU Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256673376.26028.422.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®