mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/4] Allow breakpoints to be enabled/disabled without yielding the breakpoint request through new APIs - <enable><disable>_hw_breakpoint()
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:31:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256761909.26028.1794.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091026211915.GC15529@in.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 02:49 +0530, K.Prasad wrote:

> Index: linux-2.6-tip.perf_hbkpt/include/asm-generic/hw_breakpoint.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.perf_hbkpt.orig/include/asm-generic/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ linux-2.6-tip.perf_hbkpt/include/asm-generic/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -102,11 +102,22 @@
>   * ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   */
>  struct hw_breakpoint {
> +	/*
> +	 * Denotes if a breakpoint is currently enabled in physical debug
> +	 * registers. Not to be set directly by the end-user. Must be
> +	 * operated through <enable><disable>_hw_breakpoint() APIs only.
> +	 */
> +	atomic_t enabled;

Just a nit, but by looking at this structure as a whole, it's not easy
to see that the above comment is talking just about the "enabled" part
of the structure or the entire structure itself.

Probably want to add ...

	/*
	 * The enabled item denotes if ...


-- Steve

>  	void (*triggered)(struct hw_breakpoint *, struct pt_regs *);
>  	const cpumask_t *cpumask;
>  	struct arch_hw_breakpoint info;
>  };
>  
> +enum bp_status {
> +	BP_DISABLED	= 0,
> +	BP_ENABLED	= 1
> +};
> +


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-28 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091026211225.214925175@xyz>
2009-10-26 21:17 ` [RFC Patch 1/4] Allow kernel-space hw-breakpoints to be restricted only for a subset of CPUs using a cpumask field in struct hw_breakpoint K.Prasad
2009-10-26 21:19 ` [RFC Patch 2/4] Allow breakpoints to be enabled/disabled without yielding the breakpoint request through new APIs - <enable><disable>_hw_breakpoint() K.Prasad
2009-10-28 20:31   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-10-29 21:34     ` K.Prasad
2009-10-26 21:19 ` [RFC Patch 3/4] Bugfix HW-BKPT: Fix traceback seen when resuming after suspend-to-ram K.Prasad
2009-10-26 21:20 ` [RFC Patch 4/4] Enable perf-events to use hw-breakpoints K.Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256761909.26028.1794.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®