mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mehmet Giritli <mehmet@giritli.eu>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Faulty MTRR setups in Toshiba laptops crash video drivers
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:02:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257418923.5672.12.camel@frodo.giritli.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51f3faa70911041548x70d5e4a1oabdf1739dad355c7@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:48 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Mehmet Giritli <mehmet@giritli.eu> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:06 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >> On 11/02/2009 10:28 AM, Mehmet Giritli wrote:
> >> > Hello all,
> >> >
> >> > On some laptops using ATI 3650HD radeon chipsets and 4GB ram (and may be
> >> > others as well), it is impossible to start any xserver due to (faulty?)
> >> > mtrr setups on the machine. The computer locks up or just gives an
> >> > unresponsive black screen. There are various drivers for radeon cards
> >> > and the crash occurs in all of these drivers in the very same way!
> >> >
> >> > This bug seems to occur mostly on Toshiba laptops with ATI graphic
> >> > cards. For some people, CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER seemed to cure the issue
> >> > but made no difference for many others like me.
> >> >
> >> > RadeonHD people seem to have problems in understanding the nature of
> >> > this bug. Please have a look at the threads:
> >> >
> >> > http://lists.opensuse.org/radeonhd/2009-05/msg00040.html
> >> >
> >> > and,
> >> >
> >> > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20645
> >> >
> >> > for problem reports and dev responses. RadeonHD devs suggest that some
> >> > laptops have weird mtrr setups and this must be fixed in the kernel code
> >> > and not the driver code.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I don't see enough details to be able to tell what lead
> >> them to this conclusion. Can you post the output of:
> >>
> >> lspci -vv
> >> cat /proc/mtrr
> >
> > lspci -vv
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23634
> >
> > /proc/mtrr when 4GB installed
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23632
> >
> > /proc/mtrr when 2GB installed
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23633
> >
> > There is also a bug report that I opened a while back here:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14054
> 
> So it appears that your machine has an MTRR entry which marks the
> first 16MB of the video card's video RAM BAR area as "write-through",
> which seems quite clearly wrong. However, all that I would expect to
> see this do would be to cause X to be unable to map the BAR as
> write-combining (which you can see from dmesg is indeed occurring)
> causing a loss of performance. And the same MTRR is there in the 2GB
> case as in the 4GB case. So I don't think the question of why it works
> with 2GB and not with 4GB is anything to do with MTRRs..

I was using vesafb driver for framebuffer splashscreen and after
removing it from the kernel command line, that 16MB mtrr entry is now
gone. And yes, X was very slow at startup before, now that seems to be
rectified. I don't know if thats another bug or not regarding kernel or
the radeonhd driver.

I should thank you and perhaps especially Yinghai Lu for suggesting it
in the above mentioned bug report.

However, removing vesafb did not make any improvements.

Now I'm wondering if radeonhd developers have anything specific to say
about this...

I will ask on the radeonhd list...



      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-05 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-02 16:28 Mehmet Giritli
2009-11-03  0:06 ` Robert Hancock
2009-11-03 13:08   ` Mehmet Giritli
2009-11-04 23:48     ` Robert Hancock
2009-11-05 11:02       ` Mehmet Giritli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1257418923.5672.12.camel@frodo.giritli.eu \
    --to=mehmet@giritli.eu \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®