mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Obey coherent_dma_mask for alloc_coherent on	passthrough
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:09:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257480548.2837.121.camel@2710p.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091106123400J.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 12:34 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:19:52 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 11:41 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >
> > > This is fine for 2.6.32 but we'll cleanly fix this by using
> > > swiotlb_dma_ops later, right?
> > 
> > I'm open to suggestions.  I don't really understand why we dropped
> > swiotlb for passthrough mode in 2.6.32 to start with.  It seems like we
> > now have a couple corner cases where we have to either hope for the best
> > or effectively ignore the request to use passthrough.  Thanks,
> 
> I think that the cleanest solution is setting up swiotlb_dma_ops for
> passthrough devices (and devices not behind pci, etc). Calgary IOMMU
> does the same for years.

intel-iommu was using swiotlb for the global dma_ops when in passthrough
mode until 19943b0e (2.6.31 and earlier).  I would say the next step
would be to use per device dma_ops so we can point passthrough devices
to swiotlb, as you suggest, but that seems to work against part of what
19943b0e was trying to accomplish.

Alex


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-06  4:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-04 22:59 Alex Williamson
2009-11-06  2:41 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-11-06  3:19   ` Alex Williamson
2009-11-06  3:34     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-11-06  4:09       ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2009-11-09 23:02   ` David Woodhouse
2009-11-09 23:32     ` Alex Williamson
2009-11-10  0:19       ` David Woodhouse
2009-11-11 15:23     ` [stable][PATCH] PCIe hot-plug for Intel IOMMU Fenghua Yu
2009-11-11 21:27       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-28  6:17         ` David Woodhouse
2009-11-12  2:37       ` David Woodhouse
2009-11-12 23:32         ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-11-10  0:46 ` [PATCH] intel-iommu: Obey coherent_dma_mask for alloc_coherent on passthrough David Woodhouse
2009-11-10  1:01   ` David Woodhouse
2009-11-10  1:28     ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1257480548.2837.121.camel@2710p.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®