From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751649AbZKLHpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:45:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751383AbZKLHpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:45:10 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:19273 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbZKLHpI (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:45:08 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,726,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="568811060" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make sure wakeup code is below 1M -v2 From: ykzhao To: Yinghai Lu Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Len Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list In-Reply-To: <4AFB9B60.7010009@kernel.org> References: <4AF7D820.5040503@kernel.org> <200911091315.13151.rjw@sisk.pl> <4AFA210B.3020207@kernel.org> <1257930767.31183.113.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4AFB0B02.4050306@kernel.org> <1257988632.31183.134.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4AFB7D21.6050004@kernel.org> <1257997072.3888.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4AFB9B60.7010009@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Organization: Intel Open Source Technology Center Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:43:38 +0800 Message-Id: <1258011818.3802.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 (2.22.1-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:21 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > ykzhao wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 11:12 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> ykzhao wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 03:05 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >>>> ykzhao wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 10:27 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >>>>>> try to find_e820_area/reserve_early, and call acpi_reserve_memory early > >>>>>> > >>>>>> to get area is below 1M > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -v2: change function name to acpi_reserve_wakeup_memory according to Rafael > >>>>> It seems that the function of find_e820_area is called in several > >>>>> places. > >>>>> >Initmem_init: bootmap = find_e820_area(0, end_pfn< >>>>> bootmap_size, PAGE_SIZE); > >>>>> > >>>>> If we also call it in the acpi_reserve_wakeup_memory, do we get the same > >>>>> base address as that obtained in initmem_init? > >>>> no. find_e820_area will check the reserve res array that could be updated by reserve_early. > >>> It will check the reserved region array when calling the function of > >>> find_e820_area. > >>> But it seems that the array is not updated when the find_e820_area is > >>> called in the function of initmem_init. > >> right after that will use reserve_bootmem for those range in initmem_init. > > Yes. The reserve_bootmem is called for the range in initmem_init. > > But the reserved_early array is not updated. > > it is not needed anymore because bootmem for that node is ready at that point, could use > reserve_bootmem_node directly. and before that early_res_to_bootmem will convert that early resource that > fall into that node range to bootmem reserved too. > > please check code setup_node_bootmem/early_node_mem/early_res_to_bootmem ...and reserve_bootmem_node... Sorry that I don't notice that the function of acpi_reserve_wakeup_memory is also moved early before initializing the bootmem allocator. If so, there is no problem. thanks. > > YH