mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
	Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	feng.tang@intel.com, Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	jakub@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:43:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258670580.22249.1002.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B05B7AD.20500@redhat.com>

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 14:25 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:

> Having said all that, I don't expect to personally be looking at the 
> problem, given the list of other codegen issues that need to be looked 
> at (reload in particular), profiling/stack interactions would be around 
> 87 millionth on my list.

Is there someone else that can look at it?

Or at the very least, could you point us to where that code is, and one
of us tracing folks could take a crack at switching hats to be a
compiler writer (with the obvious prerequisite of drinking a lot of beer
first, or is there a better drug to cope with the pain of writing gcc?).

-- Steve
 


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-19 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-19 21:14 H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 21:25 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 22:43   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-11-19 23:58     ` Jeff Law
2009-11-20  0:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20  0:59         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-20  1:27           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20  2:14             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20 13:09             ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Prevent GCC 4.4.x (pentium-mmx et al) function prologue wreckage tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-20  1:29           ` BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-20  5:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 12:04         ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-20 12:22           ` Andrew Haley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-19 20:48 H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-18 19:30 [patch for 2.6.32? 1/3] hrtimers: remove the "timer_stats_active" check when setting the start info Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-18 20:24 ` [tip:timers/urgent] hrtimer: Fix /proc/timer_list regression tip-bot for Feng Tang
2009-11-19  7:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-19 10:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 14:30       ` BUG: function graph tracer function frame assumptions Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 15:37         ` BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 15:44           ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 15:54             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 15:57               ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 16:02             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 16:11               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 16:19               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 16:06             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 16:17               ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 16:43                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 16:12             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 15:45           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 15:49             ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 15:52               ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 17:37               ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-19 17:39           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 17:51             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 17:59             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 18:03               ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-19 18:22                 ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:41                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:43                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:54                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 19:01                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-23  9:16                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-11-23  9:51                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 19:10                         ` David Daney
2009-11-19 19:28                           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:46                             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 19:54                               ` Kai Tietz
2009-11-19 20:05                                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:05                               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 20:17                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 20:28                                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:25                                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 20:36                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 20:44                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:50                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 20:06                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 21:12                                 ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 20:10                               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 21:05                               ` Jeff Law
2009-11-19 18:31                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 18:38                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-19 18:47                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-19 19:06                     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 19:50                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-19 20:36                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 18:20           ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:33             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-11-19 18:36               ` Andrew Pinski
2009-11-19 18:36               ` Andrew Haley
2009-11-19 18:37               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-19 18:39             ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1258670580.22249.1002.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®