From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755542AbZLBTEE (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:04:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755510AbZLBTED (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:04:03 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:56339 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754701AbZLBTEC (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:04:02 -0500 Subject: Re: some recent scheduler patches From: Peter Zijlstra To: Nick Piggin Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mike Galbraith In-Reply-To: <20091202185328.GI31517@wotan.suse.de> References: <20091202185328.GI31517@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:04:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1259780642.4003.1493.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 19:53 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > 83f54960c11a14942ab00b54c51e91906b9d8235: sched: for_each_domain() vs RCU > I don't see what is the step that causes FAIL? sched-domains code is > using synchronize_sched(), so that part should be safe. Yeah, I got myself properly confused there. I was meaning to remove that rcu_read_lock() there again.