From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
To: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] sctp: better integer overflow check in sctp_auth_create_key()
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:26:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <125BB325-72D4-4FEF-A5CC-118680EC78D2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A1A6AF9D-8C35-4702-9693-7BCBEDE27219@gmail.com>
The check from commit 30c2235c is incomplete and cannot prevent
cases like key_len = 0x80000000 (INT_MAX + 1). In that case, the
left-hand side of the check (INT_MAX - key_len), which is unsigned,
becomes 0xffffffff (UINT_MAX) and bypasses the check.
However this shouldn't be a security issue. The function is called
from the following two code paths:
1) setsockopt()
2) sctp_auth_asoc_set_secret()
In case (1), sca_keylength is never going to exceed 65535 since it's
bounded by a u16 from the user API. As such, the key length will
never overflow.
In case (2), sca_keylength is computed based on the user key (1 short)
and 2 * key_vector (3 shorts) for a total of 7 * USHRT_MAX, which still
will not overflow.
In other words, this overflow check is not really necessary. Just
make it more correct.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
---
net/sctp/auth.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/auth.c b/net/sctp/auth.c
index 865e68f..bf81204 100644
--- a/net/sctp/auth.c
+++ b/net/sctp/auth.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static struct sctp_auth_bytes *sctp_auth_create_key(__u32 key_len, gfp_t gfp)
struct sctp_auth_bytes *key;
/* Verify that we are not going to overflow INT_MAX */
- if ((INT_MAX - key_len) < sizeof(struct sctp_auth_bytes))
+ if (key_len > (INT_MAX - sizeof(struct sctp_auth_bytes)))
return NULL;
/* Allocate the shared key */
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <426D7BA8-ECD0-44D6-A09F-2033F0C825FC@gmail.com>
2011-11-28 15:45 ` [PATCH] sctp: integer overflow " Vladislav Yasevich
2011-11-29 7:33 ` Xi Wang
2011-11-29 15:03 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-11-29 19:24 ` Xi Wang
2011-11-29 19:26 ` Xi Wang [this message]
2011-11-29 19:35 ` [PATCH v2] sctp: better integer overflow check " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=125BB325-72D4-4FEF-A5CC-118680EC78D2@gmail.com \
--to=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®