mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
To: gregkh@suse.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: s5k3e2fx.c: reduce complexity by factoring
Date: Sat,  5 Dec 2009 18:03:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260065000-5573-1-git-send-email-jdm64@gawab.com> (raw)

I was style fixing some code when I ran into this code.
It seems like the code could be reduced, by factoring the expression.
But this results in a very simple expression.

Am I assuming something wrong? Or is this a bug in the original code?
This doesn't look right because the assignment of s_move[i] has no mention
of the loop counter.

Justin

------

the code was looping, seting s_move[i] to the following calculations

if (actual_step >= 0)
        s_move[i] = ((((i + 1) * gain + 0x200) - (i * gain + 0x200)) / 0x400);
else
        s_move[i] = ((((i + 1) * gain - 0x200) - (i * gain - 0x200)) / 0x400);

but, by factoring the expression, it can be shown that they both reduce
to a very simple expression:

        s_move[i] = gain / 0x400;

Signed-off-by: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
---
 drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c |   10 +++-------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c b/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c
index f0e49be..d205a2d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c
@@ -1092,14 +1092,10 @@ static int32_t s5k3e2fx_move_focus(int direction, int32_t num_steps)
 
 	actual_step = step_direction * (int16_t)num_steps;
 	pos_offset = init_code + s5k3e2fx_ctrl->curr_lens_pos;
-	gain = actual_step * 0x400 / 5;
+	gain = actual_step / 5;
 
-	for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++) {
-		if (actual_step >= 0)
-			s_move[i] = ((((i+1)*gain+0x200) - (i*gain+0x200))/0x400);
-		else
-			s_move[i] = ((((i+1)*gain-0x200) - (i*gain-0x200))/0x400);
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++)
+		s_move[i] = gain;
 
 	/* Ring Damping Code */
 	for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++) {
-- 
1.6.5.4


             reply	other threads:[~2009-12-06  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-06  2:03 Justin Madru [this message]
2009-12-09  9:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2009-12-15  0:38   ` Justin Madru
2009-12-15  0:47     ` Greg KH
2009-12-15  4:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-12-15 18:37   ` Justin Madru
2009-12-15 19:10     ` Ray Lee
2009-12-15 20:57       ` Justin Madru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1260065000-5573-1-git-send-email-jdm64@gawab.com \
    --to=jdm64@gawab.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®