From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756259AbZLUBLZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:11:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753677AbZLUBLY (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:11:24 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1353 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752095AbZLUBLX (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:11:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Restore printk sanity From: Joe Perches To: tytso@mit.edu Cc: Ingo Molnar , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, efault@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20091220221232.GC4887@thunk.org> References: <1261315437.4314.6.camel@laptop> <1261335300.30458.209.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20091220191531.GA17878@elte.hu> <20091220221232.GC4887@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:11:21 -0800 Message-ID: <1261357881.30458.235.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 17:12 -0500, tytso@mit.edu wrote: > Maybe all > printk's should be exempted from this, or at least if it's the format > string which is breaking whatever the magic boundary happens to be? If ever Andy Whitcroft gets 'round to releasing the latest checkpatch from testing, the formats of logging functions are exempted from long line checks.