From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754252AbZLUOlO (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:41:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750760AbZLUOlN (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:41:13 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:56237 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750719AbZLUOlM (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:41:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix lockdep warning in global_clock() From: Peter Zijlstra To: Li Zefan Cc: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Frederic Weisbecker , LKML In-Reply-To: <4B2F2588.8070501@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4B2F1543.8020300@cn.fujitsu.com> <20091221064356.GA2378@elte.hu> <4B2F2588.8070501@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1261406427.4314.155.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 15:36 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > +++ b/kernel/sched_clock.c > @@ -250,9 +250,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu) > unsigned long long clock; > unsigned long flags; > > - raw_local_irq_save(flags); > + local_irq_save(flags); > clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu); > - raw_local_irq_restore(flags); > + local_irq_restore(flags); > > return clock; > } > =============================================== > > I guess it's still true that lower level functions can take locks? No, I removed the locks from cpu_clock a while back.