From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, vegard.nossum@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] x86: Use KERN_DEFAULT log-level in __show_regs()
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:47:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262029654.3352.27.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261988819.4641.2.camel@penberg-laptop>
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 10:26 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
>
> Andrew Morton reported a strange looking kmemcheck warning:
>
> WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized memory (ffff88004fba6c20)
> 0000000000000000310000000000000000000000000000002413000000c9ffff
> u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u i i i i i i i i u u u u u u u u
>
> [<ffffffff810af3aa>] kmemleak_scan+0x25a/0x540
> [<ffffffff810afbcb>] kmemleak_scan_thread+0x5b/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8104d0fe>] kthread+0x9e/0xb0
> [<ffffffff81003074>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> The above printout is missing register dump completely. The problem here is
> that the output comes from syslog which doesn't show KERN_INFO log-level
> messages. We didn't see this before because both of us were testing on 32-bit
> kernels which use the _default_ log-level.
>
> Fix that up by explicitly using KERN_DEFAULT log-level for __show_regs()
> printks.
>
> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 14 +++++++-------
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 98c2cde..c6ee241 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ void show_regs_common(void)
> if (!product)
> product = "";
>
> - printk("\n");
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Pid: %d, comm: %.20s %s %s %.*s %s/%s\n",
> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
> + printk(KERN_DEFAULT "Pid: %d, comm: %.20s %s %s %.*s %s/%s\n",
What is the reason to convert KERN_INFO to KERN_DEFAULT here?
The original commit for KERN_DEFAULT said:
This adds a KERN_DEFAULT loglevel marker, for when you cannot decide
which loglevel you want, and just want to keep an existing printk
with the default loglevel.
The difference between having KERN_DEFAULT and having no log-level
marker at all is two-fold:
- having the log-level marker will now force a new-line if the
previous printout had not added one (perhaps because it forgot,
but perhaps because it expected a continuation)
- having a log-level marker is required if you are printing out a
message that otherwise itself could perhaps otherwise be mistaken
for a log-level.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-28 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-28 8:26 Pekka Enberg
2009-12-28 10:07 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Pekka Enberg
2009-12-28 19:47 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2009-12-29 7:08 ` [RFC/PATCH] " Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <1262072421.1888.57.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
2009-12-29 7:47 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262029654.3352.27.camel@Joe-Laptop.home \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®