mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: avoid huge bonus to sleepers on busy machines
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:14:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262603675.9734.36.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1262596842-17392-1-git-send-email-sjayaraman@suse.de>

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 14:50 +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> As I understand the idea of sleeper fairness is to consider sleeping tasks
> similar to the ones on the runqueue and credit the sleepers in a way that it
> would get CPU as if it were running.
> 
> Currently, when fair sleepers are enabled, the task that was sleeping seem to
> get a bonus of cfs_rq->min_vruntime - sched_latency (in most cases). While with
> gentle fair sleepers this effect was reduced to half, there still remains a
> chance that on busy machines with more number of tasks, the sleepers might get
> a huge undue bonus.

There is no bonus.  Sleepers simply get to keep some of their lag, but
any lag beyond sched_latency is trashed in the interest of reasonable
latency for non-sleepers as the sleeper preempts and tries to catch up.

	-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-04  9:20 Suresh Jayaraman
2010-01-04 11:14 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2010-01-04 12:02   ` Suresh Jayaraman
2010-01-04 12:30     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-04 12:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-04 12:49         ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1262603675.9734.36.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sjayaraman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome