mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Pass affine target cpu into wake_affine
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:48:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262659686.22471.121.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1262595827.22471.108.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 17:03 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> commit a03ecf08d7bbdd979d81163ea13d194fe21ad339
> Author: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> Date:   Mon Jan 4 14:14:50 2010 +0800
> 
>     sched: Pass affine target cpu into wake_affine
>     
>     Since commit a1f84a3(sched: Check for an idle shared cache in select_task_rq_fair()),
>     the affine target maybe adjusted to any idle cpu in cache sharing domains
>     instead of current cpu.
>     But wake_affine still use current cpu to calculate load which is wrong.
>     
>     This patch passes affine cpu into wake_affine.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>

Mike,

Any comment of this patch?

Thanks,
Lin Ming

> ---
>  kernel/sched_fair.c |   29 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 42ac3c9..0a6fa39 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1237,11 +1237,11 @@ static inline unsigned long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu,
>  
>  #endif
>  
> -static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
> +static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int affine_cpu, int sync)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *curr = current;
> -	unsigned long this_load, load;
> -	int idx, this_cpu, prev_cpu;
> +	unsigned long affine_load, load;
> +	int idx, prev_cpu;
>  	unsigned long tl_per_task;
>  	unsigned int imbalance;
>  	struct task_group *tg;
> @@ -1249,10 +1249,9 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
>  	int balanced;
>  
>  	idx	  = sd->wake_idx;
> -	this_cpu  = smp_processor_id();
>  	prev_cpu  = task_cpu(p);
>  	load	  = source_load(prev_cpu, idx);
> -	this_load = target_load(this_cpu, idx);
> +	affine_load = target_load(affine_cpu, idx);
>  
>  	if (sync) {
>  	       if (sched_feat(SYNC_LESS) &&
> @@ -1275,7 +1274,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
>  		tg = task_group(current);
>  		weight = current->se.load.weight;
>  
> -		this_load += effective_load(tg, this_cpu, -weight, -weight);
> +		affine_load += effective_load(tg, affine_cpu, -weight, -weight);
>  		load += effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, -weight);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1285,16 +1284,16 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
>  	imbalance = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * In low-load situations, where prev_cpu is idle and this_cpu is idle
> -	 * due to the sync cause above having dropped this_load to 0, we'll
> +	 * In low-load situations, where prev_cpu is idle and affine_cpu is idle
> +	 * due to the sync cause above having dropped affine_load to 0, we'll
>  	 * always have an imbalance, but there's really nothing you can do
>  	 * about that, so that's good too.
>  	 *
>  	 * Otherwise check if either cpus are near enough in load to allow this
> -	 * task to be woken on this_cpu.
> +	 * task to be woken on affine_cpu.
>  	 */
> -	balanced = !this_load ||
> -		100*(this_load + effective_load(tg, this_cpu, weight, weight)) <=
> +	balanced = !affine_load ||
> +		100*(affine_load + effective_load(tg, affine_cpu, weight, weight)) <=
>  		imbalance*(load + effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, weight));
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1306,11 +1305,11 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
>  		return 1;
>  
>  	schedstat_inc(p, se.nr_wakeups_affine_attempts);
> -	tl_per_task = cpu_avg_load_per_task(this_cpu);
> +	tl_per_task = cpu_avg_load_per_task(affine_cpu);
>  
>  	if (balanced ||
> -	    (this_load <= load &&
> -	     this_load + target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <= tl_per_task)) {
> +	    (affine_load <= load &&
> +	     affine_load + target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <= tl_per_task)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and
>  		 * p is cache cold in this domain, and
> @@ -1544,7 +1543,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flag
>  			update_shares(tmp);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (affine_sd && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
> +	if (affine_sd && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, cpu, sync))
>  		return cpu;
>  
>  	while (sd) {
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-05  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-04  9:03 Lin Ming
2010-01-04  9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-04  9:12   ` Lin Ming
2010-01-04  9:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-04 10:59       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-04 11:07         ` Lin Ming
2010-01-05  2:48 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2010-01-05  3:44   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-05  6:43     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-05 11:49       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-07  8:45       ` Lin Ming
2010-01-07  9:15         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-07  9:33         ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-07 13:14         ` Mike Galbraith
2010-01-08  2:38           ` Lin Ming
2010-01-08  3:34             ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1262659686.22471.121.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
    --to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome