From: serue@us.ibm.com
To: greg@kroah.com
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
rsc@swtch.com, Ashwin Ganti <ashwin.ganti@gmail.com>,
ericvh@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/6] p9auth: set fsuid
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:37:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262723850-9870-1-git-send-email-serue@us.ibm.com> (raw)
From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
fsuid should always trail euid changes. So p9auth should
set fsuid as well when it sets ruid and euid. Whether the
suid should also be set is an open question - keeping the
old uid in suid may be useful, or may just serve to trick
lazy userspace.
Note that so long as we do not also set suid, the setuid_fixup()
code will not (when we later switch to setresuid()) fully
fill/clear capability sets. So while I had previously thought
that keeping suid unchanged would be useful, I think it is
better to change all uids.
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
cc: rsc@swtch.com
Cc: Ashwin Ganti <ashwin.ganti@gmail.com>
Cc: ericvh@gmail.com
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/staging/p9auth/p9auth.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/p9auth/p9auth.c b/drivers/staging/p9auth/p9auth.c
index db79626..70ef45b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/p9auth/p9auth.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/p9auth/p9auth.c
@@ -275,10 +275,14 @@ static ssize_t cap_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
goto out;
}
/*
- * What all id's need to be changed here? uid,
- * euid, fsid, savedids ?? Currently I am
- * changing the effective user id since most of
- * the authorisation decisions are based on it
+ * Change all uids. It might be useful to
+ * keep suid unchanged, however that will
+ * mean that changing from uid=0 to uid=!0
+ * pP is not emptied (only pE is), and when
+ * changing from uid=!0 to uid=0, sets are
+ * not filled. They will be correct after
+ * the next exec, but this is IMO not
+ * sufficient. So change all uids.
*/
new = prepare_creds();
if (!new) {
@@ -286,7 +290,7 @@ static ssize_t cap_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
goto out;
}
new->uid = (uid_t) target_int;
- new->euid = (uid_t) target_int;
+ new->suid = new->fsuid = new->euid = new->uid;
retval = commit_creds(new);
if (retval)
goto out;
--
1.6.1
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-05 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-05 20:37 serue [this message]
2010-01-05 20:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] split core function out of some set*{u,g}id functions serue
2010-01-05 20:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] p9auth: use setresuid serue
2010-01-05 20:37 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] p9auth: add CAP_GRANT_ID to authorize use of /dev/caphash serue
2010-01-05 20:37 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] p9auth cleanup serue
2010-01-05 20:37 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] p9auth: do groups serue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262723850-9870-1-git-send-email-serue@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ashwin.ganti@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rsc@swtch.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®