From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752188Ab0AFGBe (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:01:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751314Ab0AFGBd (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:01:33 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:45087 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751095Ab0AFGBd (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:01:33 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/S/q4pljjSklaDJCWQYJs14Zg5qNsYlTipSKxFS7 bRiXQWhMEpDCZS Subject: Re: tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1 From: Mike Galbraith To: Lin Ming Cc: "peterz@infradead.org" , "mingo@elte.hu" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , linux-kernel , "Zhang, Yanmin" In-Reply-To: <1262065745.17082.0.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <1261739467.10685.18.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <1261902760.6201.33.camel@marge.simson.net> <1262052582.10685.59.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <1262064292.6412.30.camel@marge.simson.net> <1262063959.13697.6.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <1262065745.17082.0.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:01:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1262757688.6007.5.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.82 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Have you tried tbench with the vmark regression fix? If not, mind giving it a shot? -Mike