From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [patch] x86, irq: check move_in_progress before freeing the vector mapping
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:56:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262804191.2732.7.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> (raw)
x86 folks, please queue this fix for 2.6.33.
thanks,
suresh
---
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: [patch] x86, irq: check move_in_progress before freeing the vector mapping
With the recent irq migration fixes (post 2.6.32), Gary Hade has noticed
"No IRQ handler for vector" messages during the 2.6.33-rc1 kernel boot on IBM
AMD platforms and root caused the issue to this commit:
> commit 23359a88e7eca3c4f402562b102f23014db3c2aa
> Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 26 14:24:33 2009 -0800
>
> x86: Remove move_cleanup_count from irq_cfg
As part of this patch, we have removed the move_cleanup_count check
in smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(). With this change, we can run into a
situation where an irq cleanup interrupt on a cpu can cleanup the vector
mappings associated with multiple irqs, of which one of the irq's migration
might be still in progress. As such when that irq hits the old cpu, we get
the "No IRQ handler" messages.
Fix this by checking for the irq_cfg's move_in_progress and if the move
is still in progress delay the vector cleanup to another irq cleanup
interrupt request (which will happen when the irq starts arriving at the
new cpu destination).
Reported-and-tested-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index de00c46..53243ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -2434,6 +2434,13 @@ asmlinkage void smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(void)
cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
+ /*
+ * Check if the irq migration is in progress. If so, we
+ * haven't received the cleanup request yet for this irq.
+ */
+ if (cfg->move_in_progress)
+ goto unlock;
+
if (vector == cfg->vector && cpumask_test_cpu(me, cfg->domain))
goto unlock;
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 18:56 Suresh Siddha [this message]
2010-01-06 20:24 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, irq: Check " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262804191.2732.7.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome