From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"ananth@in.ibm.com" <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 5/5] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as hotplug cpus.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:21:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263349268.2854.1386.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4D2C44.2060709@kernel.org>
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:13 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 06:06 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:55 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> you mean this blacklist could be too long?
> >
> > yes.
> >
> >>
> >> switch to whitelist for the box can treat disabled cpus as hotplug
> >> cpus?
> >
> > Do we really need all this? Systems which support physical hotplug
> > typically have lot's of cpu's (mostly will have atleast > 8). Even if we
> > really need to identify, then perhaps we can check if ACPI has any hints
> > regarding the physical hotplug support at boot time (we should check
> > with Andi Kleen or Len Brown on this).
> >
> > For now, I think we can keep it simple by using the detected enabled
> > cpu's.
>
> sth like this ?
Well, I was referring more to the apic model selection than the prefill
case. About this possible cpu's, will the wastage be more than few kb
for few disabled cpu's.
thanks,
suresh
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1190,7 +1190,6 @@ early_param("possible_cpus", _setup_poss
> * - Ashok Raj
> *
> * Three ways to find out the number of additional hotplug CPUs:
> - * - If the BIOS specified disabled CPUs in ACPI/mptables use that.
> * - The user can overwrite it with possible_cpus=NUM
> * - Otherwise don't reserve additional CPUs.
> * We do this because additional CPUs waste a lot of memory.
> @@ -1205,7 +1204,7 @@ __init void prefill_possible_map(void)
> num_processors = 1;
>
> if (setup_possible_cpus == -1)
> - possible = num_processors + disabled_cpus;
> + possible = num_processors;
> else
> possible = setup_possible_cpus;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-13 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-12 23:17 [PATCH 0/5] clean up logical flat apic mode using Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 1/5] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: using logical flat for amd cpu too Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 3/5] x86: according to nr_cpu_ids to decide if need to leave logical flat Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 5/5] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as hotplug cpus Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:56 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 0:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 1:48 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 1:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 2:06 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 2:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 2:21 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2010-01-13 2:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 21:46 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-13 22:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:23 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-13 22:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:29 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 22:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:49 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 23:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 23:52 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-14 9:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1263349268.2854.1386.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®