Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix 1 untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters

[Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 13:03 +0000, Al Viro wrote: 
> OK, this stuff is in for-next, with the following changes:
> 	* nfsd call has been moved to nfsd_open()
> 	* patches reordered
> 	* masking irrelevant bits (i.e. leaving only MAY_{READ,WRITE,EXEC})
> has been taken to ima_path_check(); all callers do it and it's safer that
> way anyway.
> 
> Please, see if it's OK with you in this form; other calls of dentry_open()
> are separate story, we'll have to see which ones should and which ones
> should not get ima_path_check().  Do you have any other problems with that
> one?  If not, it's going to migrate into for-linus and into the mainline;
> this stuff is definitely 2.6.33 fodder.

Other than missing the export for ima_path_check() for nfs and the
re-ordering not being bisect safe, they look good.  I've updated
the following two patches, from Eric's patchset, and would appreciate
your applying them as well:

ima: rename ima_path_check to ima_file_check
ima: rename PATH_CHECK to FILE_CHECK

Posting them separately.

Mimi