From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>,
vegard.nossum@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Do not enable KMEMCHECK_PARTIAL_OK if DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:40:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1264786856.4242.115.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B60573E.7080108@cs.helsinki.fi>
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 15:09 +0000, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > index 5b069e4..dfd39ba 100644
> > --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> > +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > @@ -948,6 +948,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_no_scan);
> > /*
> > * Update an object's checksum and return true if it was modified.
> > */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KMEMCHECK_PARTIAL_OK
> > +static bool update_checksum(struct kmemleak_object *object)
> > +{
> > + u32 crc = 0;
> > + unsigned long ptr;
> > +
> > + for (ptr = ALIGN(object->pointer, 4);
> > + ptr < ((object->pointer + object->size) & ~3); ptr += 4) {
> > + if (!kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(ptr, 4))
> > + continue;
> > + crc = crc32(crc, (void *)ptr, 4);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (object->checksum == crc)
> > + return false;
> > + object->checksum = crc;
> > + return true;
>
> I think it would be better to add a function to _kmemcheck_ that checks
> the full object regardless of CONFIG_KMEMCHECK_PARTIAL_OK and use it here.
IIRC, it's only kmemleak using kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(), we could
convert this to check the full object. Something like below (again, not
tested yet but if you are ok with the idea I'll test it a bit more and
add a commit log):
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
index 8cc1833..b3b531a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
if (!shadow)
return true;
- status = kmemcheck_shadow_test(shadow, size);
+ status = kmemcheck_shadow_test_all(shadow, size);
return status == KMEMCHECK_SHADOW_INITIALIZED;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.c
index 3f66b82..16c6d9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.c
@@ -139,13 +139,25 @@ enum kmemcheck_shadow kmemcheck_shadow_test(void *shadow, unsigned int size)
if (x[i] == KMEMCHECK_SHADOW_INITIALIZED)
return x[i];
}
+
+ return x[0];
#else
+ return kmemcheck_shadow_test_all(shadow, size);
+#endif
+}
+
+enum kmemcheck_shadow kmemcheck_shadow_test_all(void *shadow, unsigned int size)
+{
+ uint8_t *x;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ x = shadow;
+
/* All bytes must be initialized. */
for (i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
if (x[i] != KMEMCHECK_SHADOW_INITIALIZED)
return x[i];
}
-#endif
return x[0];
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.h b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.h
index af46d9a..ff0b2f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.h
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/shadow.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ enum kmemcheck_shadow {
void *kmemcheck_shadow_lookup(unsigned long address);
enum kmemcheck_shadow kmemcheck_shadow_test(void *shadow, unsigned int size);
+enum kmemcheck_shadow kmemcheck_shadow_test_all(void *shadow,
+ unsigned int size);
void kmemcheck_shadow_set(void *shadow, unsigned int size);
#endif
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-26 17:57 Catalin Marinas
2010-01-27 6:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-27 11:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-01-27 15:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-29 17:40 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2010-01-30 8:22 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1264786856.4242.115.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=casteyde.christian@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®