From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756938Ab0BMIFu (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:05:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36390 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752595Ab0BMICF (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:02:05 -0500 From: Avi Kivity To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 24/39] KVM: SVM: Initialize fpu_active in init_vmcb() Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:01:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1266048119-14325-25-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1266048119-14325-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> References: <1266048119-14325-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org init_vmcb() sets up the intercepts as if the fpu is active, so initialize it there. This avoids an INIT from setting up intercepts inconsistent with fpu_active. Acked-by: Joerg Roedel Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity --- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c index 5b336a8..949990e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm) struct vmcb_control_area *control = &svm->vmcb->control; struct vmcb_save_area *save = &svm->vmcb->save; + svm->vcpu.fpu_active = 1; + control->intercept_cr_read = INTERCEPT_CR0_MASK | INTERCEPT_CR3_MASK | INTERCEPT_CR4_MASK; @@ -730,7 +732,6 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id) init_vmcb(svm); fx_init(&svm->vcpu); - svm->vcpu.fpu_active = 1; svm->vcpu.arch.apic_base = 0xfee00000 | MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE; if (kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(&svm->vcpu)) svm->vcpu.arch.apic_base |= MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP; -- 1.6.5.3