[PATCH 01/11] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map

mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] KVM: SVM: Don't use kmap_atomic in nested_svm_map
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:23:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1266592990-8911-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266592990-8911-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>

Use of kmap_atomic disables preemption but if we run in
shadow-shadow mode the vmrun emulation executes kvm_set_cr3
which might sleep or fault. So use kmap instead for
nested_svm_map.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 2e1e8d6..63ecd4d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ static inline int nested_svm_intr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa, enum km_type idx)
+static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa, struct page **_page)
 {
 	struct page *page;
 
@@ -1425,7 +1425,9 @@ static void *nested_svm_map(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 gpa, enum km_type idx)
 	if (is_error_page(page))
 		goto error;
 
-	return kmap_atomic(page, idx);
+	*_page = page;
+
+	return kmap(page);
 
 error:
 	kvm_release_page_clean(page);
@@ -1434,16 +1436,9 @@ error:
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void nested_svm_unmap(void *addr, enum km_type idx)
+static void nested_svm_unmap(struct page *page)
 {
-	struct page *page;
-
-	if (!addr)
-		return;
-
-	page = kmap_atomic_to_page(addr);
-
-	kunmap_atomic(addr, idx);
+	kunmap(page);
 	kvm_release_page_dirty(page);
 }
 
@@ -1451,6 +1446,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	u32 param = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 & 1;
 	u32 msr = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
+	struct page *page;
 	bool ret = false;
 	u32 t0, t1;
 	u8 *msrpm;
@@ -1458,7 +1454,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	if (!(svm->nested.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT)))
 		return false;
 
-	msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, &page);
 
 	if (!msrpm)
 		goto out;
@@ -1486,7 +1482,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	ret = msrpm[t1] & ((1 << param) << t0);
 
 out:
-	nested_svm_unmap(msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1609,6 +1605,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
 	struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
 	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	trace_kvm_nested_vmexit_inject(vmcb->control.exit_code,
 				       vmcb->control.exit_info_1,
@@ -1616,7 +1613,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 				       vmcb->control.exit_int_info,
 				       vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err);
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return 1;
 
@@ -1706,7 +1703,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	/* Exit nested SVM mode */
 	svm->nested.vmcb = 0;
 
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	kvm_mmu_reset_context(&svm->vcpu);
 	kvm_mmu_load(&svm->vcpu);
@@ -1717,9 +1714,10 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	u32 *nested_msrpm;
+	struct page *page;
 	int i;
 
-	nested_msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	nested_msrpm = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, &page);
 	if (!nested_msrpm)
 		return false;
 
@@ -1728,7 +1726,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	svm->vmcb->control.msrpm_base_pa = __pa(svm->nested.msrpm);
 
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_msrpm, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1738,8 +1736,9 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
 	struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
 	struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return false;
 
@@ -1851,7 +1850,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nested_vmcb->control.event_inj;
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = nested_vmcb->control.event_inj_err;
 
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	enable_gif(svm);
 
@@ -1877,6 +1876,7 @@ static void nested_svm_vmloadsave(struct vmcb *from_vmcb, struct vmcb *to_vmcb)
 static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	if (nested_svm_check_permissions(svm))
 		return 1;
@@ -1884,12 +1884,12 @@ static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
 	skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return 1;
 
 	nested_svm_vmloadsave(nested_vmcb, svm->vmcb);
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -1897,6 +1897,7 @@ static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 static int vmsave_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	if (nested_svm_check_permissions(svm))
 		return 1;
@@ -1904,12 +1905,12 @@ static int vmsave_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
 	skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
 
-	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, KM_USER0);
+	nested_vmcb = nested_svm_map(svm, svm->vmcb->save.rax, &page);
 	if (!nested_vmcb)
 		return 1;
 
 	nested_svm_vmloadsave(svm->vmcb, nested_vmcb);
-	nested_svm_unmap(nested_vmcb, KM_USER0);
+	nested_svm_unmap(page);
 
 	return 1;
 }
-- 
1.6.6

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-19 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-19 15:22 [PATCH 0/11] Nested SVM fixes v2 Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: SVM: Fix wrong interrupt injection in enable_irq_windows Joerg Roedel
2010-02-22 10:29   ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-22 11:05     ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: SVM: Fix schedule-while-atomic on nested exception handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: SVM: Sync all control registers on nested vmexit Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: SVM: Annotate nested_svm_map with might_sleep() Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: SVM: Fix nested msr intercept handling Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: SVM: Don't sync nested cr8 to lapic and back Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: SVM: Activate nested state only when guest state is complete Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: SVM: Remove newlines from nested trace points Joerg Roedel
2010-02-19 15:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: SVM: Don't call instruction emulator for invd and wbinvd Joerg Roedel
2010-02-21  9:53   ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-21 11:37     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-21 12:00       ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-21 12:12         ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-21  9:56 ` [PATCH 0/11] Nested SVM fixes v2 Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1266592990-8911-2-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®