mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Fix sched_clock_cpu for systems with unsynchronized TSC
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:58:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1267466280.16916.927.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100301174815.GC8224@sgi.com>


Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>

On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 09:48 -0800, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> On UV systems, the TSC is not synchronized across blades.  The
> sched_clock_cpu() function is returning values that can go backwards 
> (I've seen as much as 8 seconds) when switching between cpus.
> 
> As each cpu comes up, early_init_intel() will currently set the
> sched_clock_stable flag true.  When mark_tsc_unstable() runs, it clears
> the flag, but this only occurs once (the first time a cpu comes up whose
> TSC is not synchronized with cpu 0).  After this, early_init_intel() will
> set the flag again as the next cpu comes up.
> 
> Only set sched_clock_stable if tsc has not been marked unstable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Only affects x86 arch.
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(s
>  	if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
>  		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
>  		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
> -		sched_clock_stable = 1;
> +		if (!check_tsc_unstable())
> +			sched_clock_stable = 1;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*



  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-01 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-01 17:48 Dimitri Sivanich
2010-03-01 17:58 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh [this message]
2010-03-02 12:39 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1267466280.16916.927.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome