From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755218Ab0CDVk2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:40:28 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1392 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754898Ab0CDVk1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:40:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] printk: Convert pr_ macros to functions From: Joe Perches To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20100304133407.2d5996d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1267629618.8926.73.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100304124943.ce7c1a63.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1267738192.12993.48.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100304133407.2d5996d7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:40:26 -0800 Message-ID: <1267738826.12993.57.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 13:34 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Obviously one would need eight little functions, each of which calls > pr_everything(). Those little function still need to individually use va_list so it's just as easy to call printk directly as long as %pV is OK. What do you think of the %pV use?