From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsprintf.c: Use noinline_for_stack
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:39:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268091575.1925.61.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267929215.1937.18.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 18:33 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 18:03 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > A few noinlines might be appropriate.
> Mark static functions with noinline_for_stack
It's fine by me that the vsnprintf recursion and
(pr|dev|netdev)_<level> text reduction patches didn't make .34.
I'd like to know what you think necessary to get them into .35.
Perhaps it'd be useful if they could go into -next as-is for a
bit of wider testing.
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83940/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83724/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83726/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/83725/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-08 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 6:21 [PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_<level> macros, recursive vsnprintf Joe Perches
2010-03-04 6:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] vsprintf: Recursive vsnprintf: Add "%pV", struct va_format Joe Perches
2010-03-04 6:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] device.h drivers/base/core.c Convert dev_<level> macros to functions Joe Perches
2010-03-05 0:56 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-05 1:00 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-05 2:46 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-04 22:38 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/2] Make functions of dev_<level> macros, recursive vsnprintf Andrew Morton
2010-03-04 23:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-06 21:36 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-06 22:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-06 22:30 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-06 22:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-06 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-06 23:35 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-06 23:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-06 23:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-06 23:57 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-06 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-07 1:10 ` [PATCH] vsprintf.c: Reduce sizeof struct printf_spec from 24 to 8 bytes Joe Perches
2010-03-07 2:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-07 2:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-07 2:33 ` [PATCH] vsprintf.c: Use noinline_for_stack Joe Perches
2010-03-08 23:39 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2010-03-13 0:25 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-13 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-13 17:44 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-13 19:54 ` [PATCH] vsprintf.c: remove stack variable ksym from Joe Perches
2010-03-15 15:01 ` Paulo Marques
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268091575.1925.61.camel@Joe-Laptop.home \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick@nick-andrew.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®