From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965336Ab0COQQV (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:16:21 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:63368 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965237Ab0COQQG (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:16:06 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=u-VO3dv88eYA:10 a=7U3hwN5JcxgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=D19gQVrFAAAA:8 a=ecLG9kMwxUnGcq0mVqMA:9 a=2u0y-3sBY4QWkc4jnB-u7u8zilIA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.89.75 Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup From: Steven Rostedt Reply-To: rostedt@goodmis.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Li Zefan In-Reply-To: <1268663990.4471.808.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <2375c9f91003022204p5bdab1fdj3b3500998575fc28@mail.gmail.com> <1267710847.10871.102.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <2375c9f91003042014y17588865g8f9110e666ac2456@mail.gmail.com> <2375c9f91003042316g6e774d60n90dfc4784d3b66bf@mail.gmail.com> <1267801603.10871.1725.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100305171614.GC5244@nowhere> <4B94A816.4090608@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268061312.10871.1810.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B95AE4E.6060700@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268101394.10871.1861.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B95C2AF.7010508@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268446049.4471.787.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1268502976.4471.798.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B9D915A.6080101@cn.fujitsu.com> <1268663990.4471.808.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: Kihon Technologies Inc. Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:16:03 -0400 Message-ID: <1268669763.4471.810.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 10:39 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > As I said in the offline mail, this warning is caused by global trace_clock, > > and I sent a fix sometime ago: > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/21/4 > > Ah, I was waiting for a final Acked-by: from Peter Zijlstra. > > Peter, > > Should I pull in that patch? I don't see anything wrong with converting > a raw_local_irq_save() to a local_irq_save() in the tracing code. I'll > apply it locally and see if it fixes the warn on that I see. Peter, I ran the stress test for an hour without any lockdep warnings with Li's patch. Normally it would trigger in a second. Can I get your acked-by? Thanks, -- Steve