From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [GITPULL+PATCH 0/2 v3] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip.
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:27:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268998032.10129.44653.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
This small series ensures that struct irq_desc->chip_data is available
for alternative irq_chip implementations.
Since v2: pass x86_init_chip_data as a argument to
irq_to_desc_alloc_node instead of calling in the arch code in order to
get correct locking wrt the core code. Small impact on the SH arch code
which is the only other user outside x86 and powerpc.
Since v1: dropped the renaming portion of the series since it
was basically wrong, the functions I'd implicated as ioapic specific are
not at all.
Ian.
The following changes since commit 1ebbdcc83e75697c0d75eb091df172b7d93c84c1:
Ingo Molnar (1):
Merge branch 'perf/urgent'
are available in the git repository at:
git://xenbits.xensource.com/people/ianc/linux-2.6.git for-x86/irq
Ian Campbell (2):
irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip.
x86: irq_desc->chip_data is always correct whether or not SPARSE_IRQ is enabled.
arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 4 +-
arch/sh/kernel/cpu/irq/ipr.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 11 ++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kernel/uv_irq.c | 5 +++
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 2 +-
drivers/sh/intc.c | 7 ++--
drivers/xen/events.c | 2 +-
include/linux/interrupt.h | 2 +-
include/linux/irq.h | 16 ++++++---
kernel/irq/handle.c | 15 ++++++---
kernel/irq/numa_migrate.c | 12 ++++++-
kernel/softirq.c | 3 +-
13 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-19 11:27 Ian Campbell [this message]
2010-03-19 11:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Ian Campbell
2010-03-19 19:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-19 11:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: irq_desc->chip_data is always correct whether or not SPARSE_IRQ is enabled Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268998032.10129.44653.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®