From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752453Ab0CYPob (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:44:31 -0400 Received: from mail-out1.uio.no ([129.240.10.57]:45136 "EHLO mail-out1.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751325Ab0CYPoa (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:44:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [pnfs] [GIT BISECT] first bad commit: 1f36f774 Switch !O_CREAT case to use of do_last() From: Trond Myklebust To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Al Viro , linux-fsdevel , "J. Bruce Fields" , pNFS Mailing List , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <4BAB2937.6050703@panasas.com> References: <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> <20100324160037.GP30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4BAA3828.2070506@panasas.com> <20100324160754.GQ30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4BAA398C.5050901@panasas.com> <20100324163948.GR30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4BAA48A3.1030801@panasas.com> <4BAA4CAC.6060104@panasas.com> <4BAA5035.1060906@panasas.com> <1269453756.5982.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1269454208.5982.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4BAB2937.6050703@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:44:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1269531862.3648.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 13 msgs/h 3 sum rcpts/h 17 sum msgs/h 4 total rcpts 2627 max rcpts/h 27 ratelimit 0 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: 0752C37FA574AE7A211FC62568455209FBBF330C X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 68.40.206.115 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 3 total 262 max/h 7 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:13 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 03/24/2010 08:10 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 14:02 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> I'd say you have a corruption issue either on the server side or on your > >> client. > > > > It is surely a corruption on the client. I've tested with an old server > and it fails just the same. Yes, but we should not be seeing crap like that in the XDR decoding of a revalidate request. I strongly suspect the server should be returning an error here, probably NFS4ERR_BAD_HANDLE... After we fix the client side, I'd like to take a look at the server and see why you are getting bogus info for your GETATTR. Trond