mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, elver@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skbuff: fix a data race in skb_queue_len()
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:28:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <126aa227-2383-efdd-742c-6ccf85ae7ba4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D743FB35-3736-45E9-9DE1-8E81929D67C1@lca.pw>



On 2/3/20 12:19 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> We do not want to add READ_ONCE() for all uses of skb_queue_len()
>>
>> This could hide some real bugs, and could generate slightly less
>> efficient code in the cases we have the lock held.
> 
> Good point. I should have thought about that. How about introducing 2 new helpers.
> 
> skb_queue_len_once()
> unix_recvq_full_once()
> 
> which will have a READ_ONCE() there, and then unix_dgram_sendmsg() could use that instead?
> 

We added recently skb_queue_empty_lockless() helper, to use in these contexts.

The fact that we use READ_ONCE() is more of an implementation detail I think.

Also, addressing load-stearing issues without making sure the write side
is using WRITE_ONCE() might be not enough (even if KCSAN warnings disappear)


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-03 18:56 Qian Cai
2020-02-03 19:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-02-03 20:19   ` Qian Cai
2020-02-03 20:28     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2020-02-03 22:34       ` Qian Cai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=126aa227-2383-efdd-742c-6ccf85ae7ba4@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®