From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757351Ab0DGLbn (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:31:43 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:33498 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752393Ab0DGLbk (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:31:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock() From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: mingo@elte.hu, David Miller , acme@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, Mike Galbraith , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20100407112707.GA5143@nowhere> References: <20100406132807.698467930@chello.nl> <20100406133141.039454288@chello.nl> <20100407112707.GA5143@nowhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:31:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1270639894.20295.749.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:27 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Since we can call cpu_clock() from NMI context fix up the IRQ > > disabling to conform to the new rules. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra > > --- > > kernel/sched_clock.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c > > @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu) > > unsigned long long clock; > > unsigned long flags; > > > > - local_irq_save(flags); > > + local_irq_save_nmi(flags); > > clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu); > > - local_irq_restore(flags); > > + local_irq_restore_nmi(flags); > > > > return clock; > > } > > > That seem to add a small overhead in various places. > Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi == local_irq_save > for archs that have native nmi? That is already so, see 1/3.