From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: r6144 <rainy6144@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Process-shared futexes on hugepages puts the kernel in an infinite loop in 2.6.32.11; is this fixed now?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:45:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271691905.1488.317.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100419153245.GX19264@csn.ul.ie>
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 16:32 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Fix infinite loop in get_futex_key when backed by huge pages
>
> If a futex key happens to be located within a huge page mapped MAP_PRIVATE,
> get_futex_key() can go into an infinite loop waiting for a page->mapping
> that will never exist. This was reported and documented in an external
> bugzilla at
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552257
>
> This patch makes page->mapping a poisoned value that includes PAGE_MAPPING_ANON
> mapped MAP_PRIVATE. This is enough for futex to continue but because
> of PAGE_MAPPING_ANON, the poisoned value is not dereferenced or used by
> futex. No other part of the VM should be dereferencing the page->mapping of
> a hugetlbfs page as its page cache is not on the LRU.
>
> This patch fixes the problem with the test case described in the bugzilla.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> ---
> include/linux/poison.h | 10 ++++++++++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/poison.h b/include/linux/poison.h
> index 2110a81..0f7b5ac 100644
> --- a/include/linux/poison.h
> +++ b/include/linux/poison.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,16 @@
> #define POISON_FREE 0x6b /* for use-after-free poisoning */
> #define POISON_END 0xa5 /* end-byte of poisoning */
>
> +/********** mm/hugetlb.c **********/
> +/*
> + * Private mappings of hugetlb pages use this poisoned value for
> + * page->mapping. The core VM should not be doing anything with this mapping
> + * but futex requires the existance of some page->mapping value even if it
> + * is unused. If the core VM does deference the mapping, it'll look like a
> + * suspiciously high null-pointer offset starting from 0x2e5
> + */
> +#define HUGETLB_PRIVATE_MAPPING (0x2e4 | PAGE_MAPPING_ANON)
Wouldn't a longer poison be more recognisable? Also, shouldn't this use
POISON_POINTER_DELTA?
Something like:
#define HUGETBL_POISON ((void *) 0x00300300 + POISON_POINTER_DELTA)
0x2e5 isn't that high, I've had actual derefs in that range.
> +
> /********** arch/$ARCH/mm/init.c **********/
> #define POISON_FREE_INITMEM 0xcc
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 6034dc9..487e3c2 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ static void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
>
> mapping = (struct address_space *) page_private(page);
> set_page_private(page, 0);
> + page->mapping = NULL;
> BUG_ON(page_count(page));
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
>
> @@ -2447,8 +2448,11 @@ retry:
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> inode->i_blocks += blocks_per_huge_page(h);
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - } else
> + } else {
> lock_page(page);
> + page->mapping = (struct address_space *)
> + HUGETLB_PRIVATE_MAPPING;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 15:45 r6144
2010-04-16 20:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 11:43 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 15:32 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-19 16:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-19 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-19 16:34 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 15:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-19 16:04 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271691905.1488.317.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=rainy6144@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome