From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"eranian@gmail.com" <eranian@gmail.com>,
"Gary.Mohr@Bull.com" <Gary.Mohr@bull.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
arjan@linux.intel.com, "Zhang,
Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] perf: core, add group scheduling transactional APIs
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:51:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271922662.30535.107.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
Add group scheduling transactional APIs to struct pmu.
These APIs will be implemented in arch code, based on Peter's idea as
below.
> the idea behind hw_perf_group_sched_in() is to not perform
> schedulability tests on each event in the group, but to add the group
as
> a whole and then perform one test.
>
> Of course, when that test fails, you'll have to roll-back the whole
> group again.
>
> So start_txn (or a better name) would simply toggle a flag in the pmu
> implementation that will make pmu::enable() not perform the
> schedulablilty test.
>
> Then commit_txn() will perform the schedulability test (so note the
> method has to have a !void return value, my mistake in the earlier
> email).
>
> This will allow us to use the regular
> kernel/perf_event.c::group_sched_in() and all the rollback code.
> Currently each hw_perf_group_sched_in() implementation duplicates all
> the rolllback code (with various bugs).
Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 8 +++++---
kernel/perf_event.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index ace31fb..b16cfba 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
struct perf_event;
+#define PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED 1
+
/**
* struct pmu - generic performance monitoring unit
*/
@@ -542,6 +544,9 @@ struct pmu {
void (*stop) (struct perf_event *event);
void (*read) (struct perf_event *event);
void (*unthrottle) (struct perf_event *event);
+ void (*start_txn) (const struct pmu *pmu);
+ void (*stop_txn) (const struct pmu *pmu);
+ int (*commit_txn) (const struct pmu *pmu);
};
/**
@@ -807,9 +812,6 @@ extern void perf_disable(void);
extern void perf_enable(void);
extern int perf_event_task_disable(void);
extern int perf_event_task_enable(void);
-extern int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
- struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
- struct perf_event_context *ctx);
extern void perf_event_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event);
extern int perf_event_release_kernel(struct perf_event *event);
extern struct perf_event *
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 9dbe8cd..ffd2360 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -83,14 +83,6 @@ extern __weak const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
void __weak hw_perf_disable(void) { barrier(); }
void __weak hw_perf_enable(void) { barrier(); }
-int __weak
-hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
- struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
- struct perf_event_context *ctx)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void) { }
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, perf_disable_count);
@@ -641,15 +633,15 @@ group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_event,
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
struct perf_event_context *ctx)
{
- struct perf_event *event, *partial_group;
+ struct perf_event *event, *partial_group = NULL;
+ const struct pmu *pmu = group_event->pmu;
int ret;
if (group_event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
return 0;
- ret = hw_perf_group_sched_in(group_event, cpuctx, ctx);
- if (ret)
- return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
+ if (pmu->start_txn)
+ pmu->start_txn(pmu);
if (event_sched_in(group_event, cpuctx, ctx))
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -664,9 +656,20 @@ group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_event,
}
}
- return 0;
+ if (pmu->commit_txn) {
+ ret = pmu->commit_txn(pmu);
+ if (!ret) {
+ if (pmu->stop_txn)
+ pmu->stop_txn(pmu);
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
group_error:
+ if (pmu->stop_txn)
+ pmu->stop_txn(pmu);
+
/*
* Groups can be scheduled in as one unit only, so undo any
* partial group before returning:
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-22 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-22 7:51 Lin Ming [this message]
2010-04-22 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-22 9:19 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-22 17:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-23 2:08 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-23 2:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271922662.30535.107.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=Gary.Mohr@bull.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome