From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"eranian@gmail.com" <eranian@gmail.com>,
"Gary.Mohr@Bull.com" <Gary.Mohr@bull.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"arjan@linux.intel.com" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] perf: remove __weak function hw_perf_group_sched_in()
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:23:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271989384.3412.22.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271924997.1776.319.camel@laptop>
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 16:29 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:50 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
>
> > This patch series is to remove hw_perf_group_sched_in() first.
> >
> > patch 1: core, add group scheduling transactional APIs
> > patch 2: x86, implement group scheduling transactional APIs
> > patch 3: powerpc, implement group scheduling transactional APIs
> > patch 4: sparc, implement group scheduling transactional APIs
> >
> > Thanks for any comment.
>
> Don't RISC architectures deal better with word sized variables than with
> u8? I thought it curious you used u8 for the flags thing instead of int
> or long, but I'm not quite sure it really matters one way or the other.
Will change it to "unsigned int".
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-23 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-22 7:50 Lin Ming
2010-04-22 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-23 2:23 ` Lin Ming [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271989384.3412.22.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=Gary.Mohr@bull.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome