From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
oprofile-list <oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] oprofile/x86: return -EBUSY if counters are already reserved
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 12:44:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272969893-29233-6-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272969893-29233-1-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
In case a counter is already reserved by the watchdog or perf_event
subsystem, oprofile ignored this counters silently. This case is
handled now and oprofile_setup() now reports an error.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
arch/x86/oprofile/op_x86_model.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
index c0c21f2..9f001d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c
@@ -357,7 +357,10 @@ static int nmi_setup(void)
*/
/* Assume saved/restored counters are the same on all CPUs */
- model->fill_in_addresses(&per_cpu(cpu_msrs, 0));
+ err = model->fill_in_addresses(&per_cpu(cpu_msrs, 0));
+ if (err)
+ goto fail;
+
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
if (!cpu)
continue;
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
index 7e5886d..536d0b0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
@@ -138,21 +138,30 @@ static void op_amd_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
}
}
-static void op_amd_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
+static int op_amd_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; i++) {
if (!reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i))
- continue;
+ goto fail;
if (!reserve_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i)) {
release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
- continue;
+ goto fail;
}
/* both registers must be reserved */
msrs->counters[i].addr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i;
msrs->controls[i].addr = MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i;
+ continue;
+ fail:
+ if (!counter_config[i].enabled)
+ continue;
+ op_x86_warn_reserved(i);
+ op_amd_shutdown(msrs);
+ return -EBUSY;
}
+
+ return 0;
}
static void op_amd_setup_ctrs(struct op_x86_model_spec const *model,
@@ -172,15 +181,8 @@ static void op_amd_setup_ctrs(struct op_x86_model_spec const *model,
/* clear all counters */
for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; ++i) {
- if (unlikely(!msrs->controls[i].addr)) {
- if (counter_config[i].enabled && !smp_processor_id())
- /*
- * counter is reserved, this is on all
- * cpus, so report only for cpu #0
- */
- op_x86_warn_reserved(i);
+ if (!msrs->controls[i].addr)
continue;
- }
rdmsrl(msrs->controls[i].addr, val);
if (val & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE)
op_x86_warn_in_use(i);
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c
index 7cc80df..182558d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_p4.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static void p4_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
}
}
-static void p4_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
+static int p4_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
{
unsigned int i;
unsigned int addr, cccraddr, stag;
@@ -486,6 +486,18 @@ static void p4_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
msrs->controls[i++].addr = MSR_P4_CRU_ESCR5;
}
}
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_counters; ++i) {
+ if (!counter_config[i].enabled)
+ continue;
+ if (msrs->controls[i].addr)
+ continue;
+ op_x86_warn_reserved(i);
+ p4_shutdown(msrs);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
index b07d25a..1fd17cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -46,21 +46,30 @@ static void ppro_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
}
}
-static void ppro_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
+static int ppro_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < num_counters; i++) {
if (!reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_P6_PERFCTR0 + i))
- continue;
+ goto fail;
if (!reserve_evntsel_nmi(MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0 + i)) {
release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_P6_PERFCTR0 + i);
- continue;
+ goto fail;
}
/* both registers must be reserved */
msrs->counters[i].addr = MSR_P6_PERFCTR0 + i;
msrs->controls[i].addr = MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0 + i;
+ continue;
+ fail:
+ if (!counter_config[i].enabled)
+ continue;
+ op_x86_warn_reserved(i);
+ ppro_shutdown(msrs);
+ return -EBUSY;
}
+
+ return 0;
}
@@ -96,15 +105,8 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_x86_model_spec const *model,
/* clear all counters */
for (i = 0; i < num_counters; ++i) {
- if (unlikely(!msrs->controls[i].addr)) {
- if (counter_config[i].enabled && !smp_processor_id())
- /*
- * counter is reserved, this is on all
- * cpus, so report only for cpu #0
- */
- op_x86_warn_reserved(i);
+ if (!msrs->controls[i].addr)
continue;
- }
rdmsrl(msrs->controls[i].addr, val);
if (val & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE)
op_x86_warn_in_use(i);
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_x86_model.h b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_x86_model.h
index ff82a75..5514013 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_x86_model.h
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_x86_model.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct op_x86_model_spec {
u16 event_mask;
int (*init)(struct oprofile_operations *ops);
void (*exit)(void);
- void (*fill_in_addresses)(struct op_msrs * const msrs);
+ int (*fill_in_addresses)(struct op_msrs * const msrs);
void (*setup_ctrs)(struct op_x86_model_spec const *model,
struct op_msrs const * const msrs);
int (*check_ctrs)(struct pt_regs * const regs,
--
1.7.0.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 10:44 [PATCH 0/7] updates for oprofile Robert Richter
2010-05-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] oprofile: update file list in MAINTAINERS file Robert Richter
2010-05-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] oprofile/x86: rework error handler in nmi_setup() Robert Richter
2010-05-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] oprofile/x86: reserve counter msrs pairwise Robert Richter
2010-05-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] oprofile/x86: moving shutdown functions Robert Richter
2010-05-04 10:44 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2010-05-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] oprofile/x86: move IBS code Robert Richter
2010-05-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] oprofile/x86: remove duplicate IBS capability check Robert Richter
2010-05-06 13:03 ` [GIT PULL] updates for oprofile Robert Richter
2010-05-06 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272969893-29233-6-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome