mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/48] rcu: v2: reduce the number of spurious RCU_SOFTIRQ invocations
Date: Tue,  4 May 2010 13:19:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273004398-19760-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100504201934.GA19234@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Lai Jiangshan noted that up to 10% of the RCU_SOFTIRQ are spurious, and
traced this down to the fact that the current grace-period machinery
will uselessly raise RCU_SOFTIRQ when a given CPU needs to go through
a quiescent state, but has not yet done so.  In this situation, there
might well be nothing that RCU_SOFTIRQ can do, and the overhead can be
worth worrying about in the ksoftirqd case.  This patch therefore avoids
raising RCU_SOFTIRQ in this situation.

Changes since v1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/30/122 from Lai Jiangshan):

o	Omit the rcu_qs_pending() prechecks, as they aren't that
	much less expensive than the quiescent-state checks.

o	Merge with the set_need_resched() patch that reduces IPIs.

o	Add the new n_rp_report_qs field to the rcu_pending tracing output.

o	Update the tracing documentation accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 Documentation/RCU/trace.txt |   35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
 kernel/rcutree.c            |   11 ++++++-----
 kernel/rcutree.h            |    1 +
 kernel/rcutree_trace.c      |    4 +++-
 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index 8608fd8..efd8cc9 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -256,23 +256,23 @@ o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct
 The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows:
 
 rcu_sched:
-  0 np=255892 qsp=53936 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741
-  1 np=261224 qsp=54638 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792
-  2 np=237496 qsp=49664 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629
-  3 np=236249 qsp=48766 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723
-  4 np=221310 qsp=46850 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110
-  5 np=237332 qsp=48449 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456
-  6 np=219995 qsp=46718 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834
-  7 np=249893 qsp=49390 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888
+  0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741
+  1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792
+  2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629
+  3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723
+  4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110
+  5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456
+  6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834
+  7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888
 rcu_bh:
-  0 np=146741 qsp=1419 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314
-  1 np=155792 qsp=12597 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180
-  2 np=136629 qsp=18680 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936
-  3 np=137723 qsp=2843 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863
-  4 np=123110 qsp=12433 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671
-  5 np=137456 qsp=4210 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235
-  6 np=120834 qsp=9902 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921
-  7 np=144888 qsp=26336 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542
+  0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314
+  1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180
+  2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936
+  3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863
+  4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671
+  5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235
+  6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921
+  7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542
 
 As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh"
 portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional
@@ -284,6 +284,9 @@ o	"np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked
 o	"qsp" is the number of times that the RCU was waiting for a
 	quiescent state from this CPU.
 
+o	"rpq" is the number of times that the CPU had passed through
+	a quiescent state, but not yet reported it to RCU.
+
 o	"cbr" is the number of times that this CPU had RCU callbacks
 	that had passed through a grace period, and were thus ready
 	to be invoked.
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index c60fd74..ba69969 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1161,8 +1161,6 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
  */
 void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
 {
-	if (!rcu_pending(cpu))
-		return; /* if nothing for RCU to do. */
 	if (user ||
 	    (idle_cpu(cpu) && rcu_scheduler_active &&
 	     !in_softirq() && hardirq_count() <= (1 << HARDIRQ_SHIFT))) {
@@ -1194,7 +1192,8 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
 		rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
 	}
 	rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(cpu);
-	raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
+	if (rcu_pending(cpu))
+		raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1534,18 +1533,20 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	check_cpu_stall(rsp, rdp);
 
 	/* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */
-	if (rdp->qs_pending) {
+	if (rdp->qs_pending && !rdp->passed_quiesc) {
 
 		/*
 		 * If force_quiescent_state() coming soon and this CPU
 		 * needs a quiescent state, and this is either RCU-sched
 		 * or RCU-bh, force a local reschedule.
 		 */
+		rdp->n_rp_qs_pending++;
 		if (!rdp->preemptable &&
 		    ULONG_CMP_LT(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - 1,
 				 jiffies))
 			set_need_resched();
-		rdp->n_rp_qs_pending++;
+	} else if (rdp->qs_pending && rdp->passed_quiesc) {
+		rdp->n_rp_report_qs++;
 		return 1;
 	}
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 11f1711..14c040b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
 	/* 5) __rcu_pending() statistics. */
 	unsigned long n_rcu_pending;	/* rcu_pending() calls since boot. */
 	unsigned long n_rp_qs_pending;
+	unsigned long n_rp_report_qs;
 	unsigned long n_rp_cb_ready;
 	unsigned long n_rp_cpu_needs_gp;
 	unsigned long n_rp_gp_completed;
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index d45db2e..36c95b4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -241,11 +241,13 @@ static const struct file_operations rcugp_fops = {
 static void print_one_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 	seq_printf(m, "%3d%cnp=%ld "
-		   "qsp=%ld cbr=%ld cng=%ld gpc=%ld gps=%ld nf=%ld nn=%ld\n",
+		   "qsp=%ld rpq=%ld cbr=%ld cng=%ld "
+		   "gpc=%ld gps=%ld nf=%ld nn=%ld\n",
 		   rdp->cpu,
 		   cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) ? '!' : ' ',
 		   rdp->n_rcu_pending,
 		   rdp->n_rp_qs_pending,
+		   rdp->n_rp_report_qs,
 		   rdp->n_rp_cb_ready,
 		   rdp->n_rp_cpu_needs_gp,
 		   rdp->n_rp_gp_completed,
-- 
1.7.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-04 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-04 20:19 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/48] v4 patches queued for 2.6.35 Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/48] rcu: optionally leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 22:46   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-05 23:05     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 23:24       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-05 23:36         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-06  2:05           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-06 23:09             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/48] rcu: substitute set_need_resched for sending resched IPIs Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/48] rcu: make dead code really dead Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/48] rcu: move some code from macro to function Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/48] rcu: ignore offline CPUs in last non-dyntick-idle CPU check Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/48] rcu: Fix bogus CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING in comments to reflect reality Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/48] rcu: fix now-bogus rcu_scheduler_active comments Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/48] rcu: shrink rcutiny by making synchronize_rcu_bh() be inline Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/48] rcu: rename rcutiny rcu_ctrlblk to rcu_sched_ctrlblk Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/48] rcu: refactor RCU's context-switch handling Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/48] rcu: slim down rcutiny by removing rcu_scheduler_active and friends Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/48] rcu: enable CPU_STALL_VERBOSE by default Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/48] rcu: disable CPU stall warnings upon panic Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/48] rcu: print boot-time console messages if RCU configs out of ordinary Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/48] rcu: improve RCU CPU stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/48] rcu: permit discontiguous cpu_possible_mask CPU numbering Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/48] rcu: improve the RCU CPU-stall warning documentation Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/48] Debugobjects transition check Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/48] rcu head introduce rcu head init on stack Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/48] remove all rcu head initializations, except on_stack initializations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:27   ` Matt Mackall
2010-05-04 20:36     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 23:44   ` James Morris
2010-05-05  0:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/48] rcu head remove init Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/48] tree/tiny rcu: Add debug RCU head objects (v5) Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/48] rcu: make SRCU usable in modules Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/48] rcu: fix debugobjects rcu head init on stack in rcutree_plugin.h Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/48] rcu: RCU_FAST_NO_HZ must check RCU dyntick state Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 27/48] vfs: add fs.h to define struct file Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 28/48] net: Make accesses to ->br_port safe for sparse RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 21:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-04 21:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 22:03       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-06 14:09         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-06 23:12           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 29/48] rcu: add an rcu_dereference_index_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 30/48] mce: convert to rcu_dereference_index_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 31/48] rcu: define __rcu address space modifier for sparse Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:58   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 23:07     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 32/48] rculist: avoid __rcu annotations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 33/48] cgroups: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:48   ` Paul Menage
2010-05-05  0:04     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 34/48] credentials: rcu annotation Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 35/48] keys: __rcu annotations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/48] nfs: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 37/48] net: __rcu annotations for drivers Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 38/48] perf_event: __rcu annotations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 39/48] notifiers: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 40/48] radix-tree: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 41/48] idr: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 42/48] input: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 43/48] vhost: add " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 21:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-04 23:57     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 23:59       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-05  0:39         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 44/48] net/netfilter: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 45/48] kvm: add " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 46/48] kernel: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 47/48] net: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 48/48] kvm: more " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 10:14 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/48] nfs: " David Howells
2010-05-05 12:44   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-05 21:01     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273004398-19760-17-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®