From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] tty: remove release_tty_lock/reacquire_tty_lock
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 00:33:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273012433-6125-13-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273012433-6125-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
All users are nonrecursive now, and we don't call release_tty_lock()
in places where it's not held to start with, so it is safe to
replace it with tty_lock().
Same for reacquire_tty_lock()/tty_unlock().
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c | 8 +++---
drivers/char/tty_mutex.c | 35 ------------------------
include/linux/tty.h | 65 ++++++++++++---------------------------------
kernel/printk.c | 9 ++++--
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
index c71a94a..0c0e935 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -537,9 +537,9 @@ static int tty_ldisc_halt(struct tty_struct *tty)
int ret;
clear_bit(TTY_LDISC, &tty->flags);
if (tty_locked()) {
- __release_tty_lock();
+ tty_unlock();
ret = cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tty->buf.work);
- __reacquire_tty_lock();
+ tty_lock();
} else {
ret = cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tty->buf.work);
@@ -870,9 +870,9 @@ void tty_ldisc_release(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *o_tty)
*/
tty_ldisc_halt(tty);
- release_tty_lock(current);
+ tty_unlock();
flush_scheduled_work();
- reacquire_tty_lock(current);
+ tty_lock();
mutex_lock_tty_on(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
/*
* Now kill off the ldisc
diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_mutex.c b/drivers/char/tty_mutex.c
index 6bd47e1..5fd3332 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_mutex.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_mutex.c
@@ -24,41 +24,6 @@
static DEFINE_MUTEX(big_tty_mutex);
/*
- * Re-acquire the kernel semaphore.
- *
- * This function is called with preemption off.
- *
- * We are executing in schedule() so the code must be extremely careful
- * about recursion, both due to the down() and due to the enabling of
- * preemption. schedule() will re-check the preemption flag after
- * reacquiring the semaphore.
- */
-int __lockfunc __reacquire_tty_lock(void)
-{
- struct task_struct *task = current;
- int saved_tty_lock_depth = task->tty_lock_depth;
-
- BUG_ON(saved_tty_lock_depth < 0);
-
- task->tty_lock_depth = -1;
- preempt_enable_no_resched();
-
- mutex_lock(&big_tty_mutex);
-
- preempt_disable();
- task->tty_lock_depth = saved_tty_lock_depth;
-
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__reacquire_tty_lock);
-
-void __lockfunc __release_tty_lock(void)
-{
- mutex_unlock(&big_tty_mutex);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__release_tty_lock);
-
-/*
* Getting the big tty mutex.
*/
void __lockfunc tty_lock(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h
index 3cf4556..9b76f8b 100644
--- a/include/linux/tty.h
+++ b/include/linux/tty.h
@@ -580,16 +580,6 @@ extern long vt_compat_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * file,
extern void __lockfunc tty_lock(void) __acquires(tty_lock);
extern void __lockfunc tty_unlock(void) __releases(tty_lock);
#define tty_locked() (current->tty_lock_depth >= 0)
-int __lockfunc __reacquire_tty_lock(void);
-void __lockfunc __release_tty_lock(void);
-#define release_tty_lock(tsk) do { \
- if (unlikely((tsk)->tty_lock_depth >= 0)) \
- __release_tty_lock(); \
-} while (0)
-#define reacquire_tty_lock(tsk) \
- ((tsk->tty_lock_depth >= 0) ? \
- __reacquire_tty_lock() : 0 )
-
#else
static inline void tty_lock(void) __acquires(kernel_lock)
{
@@ -601,17 +591,6 @@ static inline void tty_unlock(void) __releases(kernel_lock)
unlock_kernel();
}
#define tty_locked() (kernel_locked())
-static inline int __reacquire_tty_lock(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-static inline void __release_tty_lock(void)
-{
-}
-
-#define release_tty_lock(tsk) do { } while (0)
-#define reacquire_tty_lock(tsk) do { } while (0)
-
#endif
/*
@@ -642,9 +621,9 @@ static inline void __release_tty_lock(void)
({ \
if (!mutex_trylock(mutex)) { \
if (tty_locked()) { \
- __release_tty_lock(); \
+ tty_unlock(); \
mutex_lock(mutex); \
- __reacquire_tty_lock(); \
+ tty_lock(); \
} else \
mutex_lock(mutex); \
} \
@@ -652,26 +631,18 @@ static inline void __release_tty_lock(void)
#define mutex_lock_tty_on(mutex) \
({ \
+ WARN_ON(!tty_locked()); \
if (!mutex_trylock(mutex)) { \
- if (!WARN_ON(!tty_locked())) { \
- __release_tty_lock(); \
- mutex_lock(mutex); \
- __reacquire_tty_lock(); \
- } else \
- mutex_lock(mutex); \
+ tty_unlock(); \
+ mutex_lock(mutex); \
+ tty_lock(); \
} \
})
#define mutex_lock_tty_off(mutex) \
({ \
- if (!mutex_trylock(mutex)) { \
- if (WARN_ON(tty_locked())) { \
- __release_tty_lock(); \
- mutex_lock(mutex); \
- __reacquire_tty_lock(); \
- } else \
- mutex_lock(mutex); \
- } \
+ WARN_ON(tty_locked()); \
+ mutex_lock(mutex); \
})
#define mutex_lock_interruptible_tty(mutex) \
@@ -679,9 +650,9 @@ static inline void __release_tty_lock(void)
int __ret = 0; \
if (!mutex_trylock(mutex)) { \
if (tty_locked()) { \
- __release_tty_lock(); \
+ tty_unlock(); \
__ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(mutex); \
- __reacquire_tty_lock(); \
+ tty_lock(); \
} else \
__ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(mutex); \
} \
@@ -707,18 +678,18 @@ static inline void __release_tty_lock(void)
do { \
if (condition) \
break; \
- release_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_unlock(); \
__wait_event(wq, condition); \
- reacquire_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_lock(); \
} while (0)
#define wait_event_timeout_tty(wq, condition, timeout) \
({ \
long __ret = timeout; \
if (!(condition)) { \
- release_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_unlock(); \
__wait_event_timeout(wq, condition, __ret); \
- reacquire_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_lock(); \
} \
__ret; \
})
@@ -727,9 +698,9 @@ do { \
({ \
int __ret = 0; \
if (!(condition)) { \
- release_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_unlock(); \
__wait_event_interruptible(wq, condition, __ret); \
- reacquire_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_lock(); \
} \
__ret; \
})
@@ -738,9 +709,9 @@ do { \
({ \
long __ret = timeout; \
if (!(condition)) { \
- release_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_unlock(); \
__wait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, condition, __ret); \
- reacquire_tty_lock(current); \
+ tty_lock(); \
} \
__ret; \
})
diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 30669a3..b9fb322 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -976,9 +976,12 @@ void acquire_console_sem(void)
* it's not clear whether we get the BTM while
* holding console_sem, need to check.
*/
- release_tty_lock(current);
- down(&console_sem);
- reacquire_tty_lock(current);
+ if (tty_locked()) {
+ tty_unlock();
+ down(&console_sem);
+ tty_lock();
+ } else
+ down(&console_sem);
}
if (console_suspended)
return;
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 22:33 [PATCH v2 00/13] BKL conversion in tty layer Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 01/13] tty: replace BKL with a new tty_lock Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 02/13] tty: make atomic_write_lock release tty_lock Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 10:57 ` Alan Cox
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 03/13] tty: make tty_port->mutex nest under tty_lock Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 04/13] tty: make termios mutex " Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 16:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 05/13] tty: make ldisc_mutex " Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 06/13] tty: never hold BTM while getting tty_mutex Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 07/13] tty: give up BTM in acquire_console_sem Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 08/13] tty: release tty lock when blocking Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 09/13] tty: implement BTM as mutex instead of BKL Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 10/13] tty: untangle locking of wait_until_sent Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 19:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-05-05 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 22:51 ` Greg KH
2010-05-05 23:52 ` Alan Cox
2010-05-24 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-24 20:27 ` Alan Cox
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 11/13] tty: remove tty_lock_nested Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 22:33 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-05-04 22:33 ` [PATCH 13/13] tty: turn ldisc_mutex into a regular mutex Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 10:52 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] BKL conversion in tty layer Alan Cox
2010-05-05 12:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1273012433-6125-13-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®