mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Carl Love <carll@us.ibm.com>, Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@us.ibm.com>,
	stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf_events: PERF_FORMAT_GROUP not working correctly when monitoring another task
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 22:22:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273177360.1642.280.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE321F8.1050309@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 13:09 -0700, Corey Ashford wrote:
> The patch works with the test case I provided, but for some reason it 
> breaks the normal operation of the libpfm4 "task" utility.  If I put 
> more than one event in a group, I get zero counts on all but the first 
> event.  That's even if I don't use the PERF_FORMAT_GROUP option.

Bugger,.. weird though, I can't see how it would affect the state before
the counters get detached from their context (exit() / close()).

> So something appears to be messed up.  I will see if I can construct an 
> arch-independent test case which demonstrates the problem.

That would be awesome, thanks!



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-06 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-04  2:06 Corey Ashford
2010-05-06 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-06 20:09   ` Corey Ashford
2010-05-06 20:22     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-05-07  2:40       ` Corey Ashford
2010-05-07 18:41   ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Fix exit() vs PERF_FORMAT_GROUP tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273177360.1642.280.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=carll@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpjohn@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome