From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752744Ab0EGM7K (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2010 08:59:10 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:45494 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751105Ab0EGM7H (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2010 08:59:07 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=OMZqYO3L41gFG4eI735GctFZkIqa2t9YKv4cWfI71LE= c=1 sm=0 a=8LHCb4_oiB0A:10 a=7U3hwN5JcxgA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=gMqfjgEr1zLu/65IO0LwxA==:17 a=E6pNk5DXc5hTfzv0XAwA:9 a=ojLlRFdJrGcCxutc6ligmHQ9NGsA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=gMqfjgEr1zLu/65IO0LwxA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.89.75 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9 - v2][RFC] tracing: Remove per event trace registering From: Steven Rostedt Reply-To: rostedt@goodmis.org To: Li Zefan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Masami Hiramatsu , Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <4BE3CD51.4050406@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20100504034045.085822814@goodmis.org> <20100504034202.282030521@goodmis.org> <4BE3CD51.4050406@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: Kihon Technologies Inc. Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 08:59:05 -0400 Message-ID: <1273237145.22438.75.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 16:20 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > > @@ -935,11 +947,11 @@ event_create_dir(struct ftrace_event_call *call, struct dentry *d_events, > > return -1; > > } > > > > - if (call->regfunc) > > + if (call->class->probe || call->class->reg) > > trace_create_file("enable", 0644, call->dir, call, > > enable); > > > > - if (call->id && call->perf_event_enable) > > + if (call->id && (call->class->perf_probe || call->class->reg)) > > trace_create_file("id", 0444, call->dir, call, > > id); > > > > Accessing of ->perf_probe needs to be guarded with CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS, > otherwise it won't pass compile. > > The original code is fine, because ->perf_event_enable is always there > regardless of CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS. Good catch! I wanted to test the !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS but that needs to be done on a non x86 box. I'll need to do that before posting my non-RFC patch set. -- Steve