From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754072Ab0ETBNL (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 21:13:11 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:49500 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751791Ab0ETBNJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 21:13:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=vtxUQCKELbXFCg0R/VVEBdDDHMksPV2RZbb5+fplnMoCSvEO1DGP/qIR0ETCrgmkqs 9l6Gshr4nYD95QhmtNbJHGx6KsqFb/c6SDaYaFmPf2LJI+Ugn2es2TgzucBd6POUPNx4 73er76f6gevcwT6sE8Uv9C5gLKf1sUlBknUh0= Subject: Re: [RFC] Try a bit harder to get output on the screen at panic time From: Maxim Levitsky To: Jesse Barnes Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Dave Airlie , James Simmons In-Reply-To: <20100519173449.6babbdfa@virtuousgeek.org> References: <20100409151050.74ef6dcd@virtuousgeek.org> <20100519173449.6babbdfa@virtuousgeek.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 04:13:03 +0300 Message-ID: <1274317983.2815.1.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 17:34 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:10:50 -0700 > Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > This set of 3 patches makes it a little more likely we'll get panic > > output onto the screen even when X is running, assuming a KMS enabled > > stack anyway. > > > > It gets me from a blank or very sparsely populated black screen at > > panic time, to one including the full backtrace and panic output at > > panic time (tested with "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" from an X > > session). > > > > It doesn't cover every case; for instance I think it'll fail when X has > > disabled the display, but those cases need to be handled with separate > > patches anyway (need to add atomic DPMS paths for instance). > > > > Anyway, please test these out and let me know if they work for you. > > Ping Linus & Dave again. Have you guys tried these? Really, it's cool. > Second that, just tested these patches, and these work perfectly. One more reason for me to dump nvidia driver for nouveau. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky