From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758912Ab0E1Px4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 11:53:56 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:56607 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758892Ab0E1Pxz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 11:53:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Oleg Nesterov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , williams@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20100528035147.GD11364@uudg.org> References: <20100527180431.GP13035@uudg.org> <20100527183319.GA22313@redhat.com> <20100528090357.7DFB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100528035147.GD11364@uudg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 17:53:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1275062007.27810.9749.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 00:51 -0300, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote: > + param.sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1; > + sched_setscheduler_nocheck(p, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); Argh, so you got me confused as well. the sched_param ones are userspace values, so you should be using 1.