mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: <mingo@elte.hu>, <norsk5@yahoo.com>
Cc: <hpa@zytor.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] amd64_edac: Fix DCT base address selector
Date: Tue,  1 Jun 2010 15:29:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275398971-12439-7-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275398971-12439-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>

From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>

The correct check is to verify whether in high range we're below 4GB
and not to extract the DctSelBaseAddr again. See "2.8.5 Routing DRAM
Requests" in the F10h BKDG.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # .32.x .33.x
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
---
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 80600f1..6866b98 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static inline u64 f10_get_base_addr_offset(u64 sys_addr, int hi_range_sel,
 	u64 chan_off;
 
 	if (hi_range_sel) {
-		if (!(dct_sel_base_addr & 0xFFFFF800) &&
+		if (!(dct_sel_base_addr & 0xFFFF0000) &&
 		   hole_valid && (sys_addr >= 0x100000000ULL))
 			chan_off = hole_off << 16;
 		else
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-01 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-01 13:29 [PATCH 0/6] AMD64 EDAC fixes and updates Borislav Petkov
2010-06-01 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] amd64_edac: Dump syndrome size in debug mode Borislav Petkov
2010-06-01 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] edac: Remove EDAC_DEBUG_VERBOSE Borislav Petkov
2010-06-01 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] amd64_edac: Remove unneeded defines Borislav Petkov
2010-06-01 13:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86, mce: Notify about corrected events too Borislav Petkov
2010-06-02  7:11   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-01 13:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] amd64_edac: Remove polling mechanism Borislav Petkov
2010-06-01 13:29 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2010-06-01 15:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] amd64_edac: Correct scrub rate setting Borislav Petkov
2010-06-01 15:20 ` [PATCH 8/8] edac, mc: Improve scrub rate handling Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275398971-12439-7-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome